37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 565965 |
Time | |
Date | 200210 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : 2s1.airport |
State Reference | WA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 2600 flight time type : 2400 |
ASRS Report | 565965 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | other other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I taxied my airplane into a hole on a grass taxiway and caused a minor propeller strike. There was no loss of RPM and I did not realize that the propeller had impacted the sod. I flew from vashon to renton airport (about 20 NM) and then back to vashon, still without realizing the strike had occurred. When I did the preflight prior to leaving vashon the second time, I discovered grass stains and nicks on the propeller tips. I then flew the airplane from vashon to tacoma (tiw) to have the propeller checked by a mechanic. He had the propeller repaired and performed the required airworthiness directive. Upon reflection, I feel that I should not have flown the airplane without having it first inspected by a mechanic. Perhaps more information could be made available about the potential seriousness of a propeller strike. I think that there are at least 2 human performance considerations: 1) failure to complete a thorough preflight when leaving renton, after the first flight leg, and 2) lack of knowledge about the serious nature of even a minor propeller strike.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 PLT HAD THE PROP STRIKE THE GND WHEN HE TAXIED INTO A HOLE ON THE GRASS TXWY. THE PLT THEN FLEW HOME AFTER DETECTING THE DAMAGE.
Narrative: I TAXIED MY AIRPLANE INTO A HOLE ON A GRASS TXWY AND CAUSED A MINOR PROP STRIKE. THERE WAS NO LOSS OF RPM AND I DID NOT REALIZE THAT THE PROP HAD IMPACTED THE SOD. I FLEW FROM VASHON TO RENTON ARPT (ABOUT 20 NM) AND THEN BACK TO VASHON, STILL WITHOUT REALIZING THE STRIKE HAD OCCURRED. WHEN I DID THE PREFLT PRIOR TO LEAVING VASHON THE SECOND TIME, I DISCOVERED GRASS STAINS AND NICKS ON THE PROP TIPS. I THEN FLEW THE AIRPLANE FROM VASHON TO TACOMA (TIW) TO HAVE THE PROP CHKED BY A MECH. HE HAD THE PROP REPAIRED AND PERFORMED THE REQUIRED AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE. UPON REFLECTION, I FEEL THAT I SHOULD NOT HAVE FLOWN THE AIRPLANE WITHOUT HAVING IT FIRST INSPECTED BY A MECH. PERHAPS MORE INFO COULD BE MADE AVAILABLE ABOUT THE POTENTIAL SERIOUSNESS OF A PROP STRIKE. I THINK THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST 2 HUMAN PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS: 1) FAILURE TO COMPLETE A THOROUGH PREFLT WHEN LEAVING RENTON, AFTER THE FIRST FLT LEG, AND 2) LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE SERIOUS NATURE OF EVEN A MINOR PROP STRIKE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.