37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 569354 |
Time | |
Date | 200212 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sun.airport |
State Reference | ID |
Altitude | msl single value : 6500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sun.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Citation I |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Route In Use | arrival : vfr enroute other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 4900 flight time type : 760 |
ASRS Report | 569354 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : vfr in imc non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : exited adverse environment flight crew : diverted to another airport |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Weather |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I had planned to fly passenger from slc to sun. While en route, it became clear that sun was below landing minimums, so I diverted to twf. My job was to deliver the aircraft to sun as soon as WX permitted and to leave it in a storage hangar. After about 2 hours had passed, sun was reporting 1800 ft broken ceiling and about 5 mi visibility. I then departed twf VFR, without passenger, for the 55 NM trip up to sun. I flew slightly east for 10 mi, then due north towards wtsox intersection at about 6500 ft. Since the visibility en route was slowly decreasing from about 10 to 5 mi, I set my radar altimeter for a 1000 ft warning and slowed the aircraft to a comfortable 130 KTS. At about 15 NM south of intersection west, the tower reported good visibility and 'few' clouds at 800 ft, with a high overcast above., however, the visibility between me and the airport became less, in a hurry (4 mi, 3 mi), whereas, I had diagnosed the WX as 'haze.' I briefly entered a small cloud. Because of this, I immediately initiated a climb and reversed my course in order to return to twf. Within a 300 ft climb and about 15 seconds, I was in the clear again, yet disappointed with my performance. I did not intend to enter a cloud (IMC) while operating VFR. I called salt lake center, who indicated a long delay for an approach. 90% of my operations are conducted IFR. This particular afternoon, I decided to go VFR, because the flight was supposed to take 14-16 mins, the visibility was portrayed to be VFR, and ZLC normally cannot provide radar services below about 12000 ft. In retrospect, I should realize that the image of clouds and visibility that I 'paint' in my mind by studying reports and forecasts can be inaccurate, even across a short route segment. Also, the fact that haze can hide clouds, especially when visibility is lessened to 3 mi or less, should be appreciated. Afterwards, I learned that conditions at sun had gone from marginal to 1-2 mi visibility in snow, to clear throughout the afternoon. No matter how familiar I am with the plains south of sun, I will prefer to fly only IFR in the future.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: VFR C500 LNDG SUN ENCOUNTERS IMC.
Narrative: I HAD PLANNED TO FLY PAX FROM SLC TO SUN. WHILE ENRTE, IT BECAME CLR THAT SUN WAS BELOW LNDG MINIMUMS, SO I DIVERTED TO TWF. MY JOB WAS TO DELIVER THE ACFT TO SUN AS SOON AS WX PERMITTED AND TO LEAVE IT IN A STORAGE HANGAR. AFTER ABOUT 2 HRS HAD PASSED, SUN WAS RPTING 1800 FT BROKEN CEILING AND ABOUT 5 MI VISIBILITY. I THEN DEPARTED TWF VFR, WITHOUT PAX, FOR THE 55 NM TRIP UP TO SUN. I FLEW SLIGHTLY E FOR 10 MI, THEN DUE N TOWARDS WTSOX INTXN AT ABOUT 6500 FT. SINCE THE VISIBILITY ENRTE WAS SLOWLY DECREASING FROM ABOUT 10 TO 5 MI, I SET MY RADAR ALTIMETER FOR A 1000 FT WARNING AND SLOWED THE ACFT TO A COMFORTABLE 130 KTS. AT ABOUT 15 NM S OF INTXN W, THE TWR RPTED GOOD VISIBILITY AND 'FEW' CLOUDS AT 800 FT, WITH A HIGH OVCST ABOVE., HOWEVER, THE VISIBILITY BTWN ME AND THE ARPT BECAME LESS, IN A HURRY (4 MI, 3 MI), WHEREAS, I HAD DIAGNOSED THE WX AS 'HAZE.' I BRIEFLY ENTERED A SMALL CLOUD. BECAUSE OF THIS, I IMMEDIATELY INITIATED A CLB AND REVERSED MY COURSE IN ORDER TO RETURN TO TWF. WITHIN A 300 FT CLB AND ABOUT 15 SECONDS, I WAS IN THE CLR AGAIN, YET DISAPPOINTED WITH MY PERFORMANCE. I DID NOT INTEND TO ENTER A CLOUD (IMC) WHILE OPERATING VFR. I CALLED SALT LAKE CTR, WHO INDICATED A LONG DELAY FOR AN APCH. 90% OF MY OPS ARE CONDUCTED IFR. THIS PARTICULAR AFTERNOON, I DECIDED TO GO VFR, BECAUSE THE FLT WAS SUPPOSED TO TAKE 14-16 MINS, THE VISIBILITY WAS PORTRAYED TO BE VFR, AND ZLC NORMALLY CANNOT PROVIDE RADAR SVCS BELOW ABOUT 12000 FT. IN RETROSPECT, I SHOULD REALIZE THAT THE IMAGE OF CLOUDS AND VISIBILITY THAT I 'PAINT' IN MY MIND BY STUDYING RPTS AND FORECASTS CAN BE INACCURATE, EVEN ACROSS A SHORT RTE SEGMENT. ALSO, THE FACT THAT HAZE CAN HIDE CLOUDS, ESPECIALLY WHEN VISIBILITY IS LESSENED TO 3 MI OR LESS, SHOULD BE APPRECIATED. AFTERWARDS, I LEARNED THAT CONDITIONS AT SUN HAD GONE FROM MARGINAL TO 1-2 MI VISIBILITY IN SNOW, TO CLR THROUGHOUT THE AFTERNOON. NO MATTER HOW FAMILIAR I AM WITH THE PLAINS S OF SUN, I WILL PREFER TO FLY ONLY IFR IN THE FUTURE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.