Narrative:

Kphl approach cleared me for an approach, and I refused to comply with their clearance. Kphl wanted me to fly an unstabilized approach, I told them 'no,' and told them what I would do. Kphl wanted me to hold 190 KTS to the marker and make an IFR approach at night, in the rain to a damp/wet runway, with a quartering tailwind. We at air carrier X need to clearly explain, in writing, to the kphl approach facility what our stabilized approach parameters are. We need to explain to the approach control facility that there are no exceptions that would allow an unstabilized approach by an air carrier X jet.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737 FLC ELECTS NOT TO ACCEPT AN APCH CLRNC DUE TO UNSATISFACTORY ALT AND DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR APCH AND LNDG AT KPHL.

Narrative: KPHL APCH CLRED ME FOR AN APCH, AND I REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH THEIR CLRNC. KPHL WANTED ME TO FLY AN UNSTABILIZED APCH, I TOLD THEM 'NO,' AND TOLD THEM WHAT I WOULD DO. KPHL WANTED ME TO HOLD 190 KTS TO THE MARKER AND MAKE AN IFR APCH AT NIGHT, IN THE RAIN TO A DAMP/WET RWY, WITH A QUARTERING TAILWIND. WE AT ACR X NEED TO CLRLY EXPLAIN, IN WRITING, TO THE KPHL APCH FACILITY WHAT OUR STABILIZED APCH PARAMETERS ARE. WE NEED TO EXPLAIN TO THE APCH CTL FACILITY THAT THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS THAT WOULD ALLOW AN UNSTABILIZED APCH BY AN ACR X JET.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.