37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 572688 |
Time | |
Date | 200301 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : gai.airport |
State Reference | MD |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Learjet 31 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 572688 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We departed gai without obtaining a release for our ATC clearance. Contributing factors include the captain monitoring the local frequency during the issuance of the clearance, lack of familiarity with procedures concerning IFR departures from uncontrolled fields on the part of the first officer, and the captain's failure to properly monitor the clearance process. Once airborne, a clearance was received without further incident, and the portion of the flight was conducted under VFR conditions. To rectify this situation, emphasis should be placed in training on clearance procedures, and the procedures themselves could possibly be simplified.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: IFR LJ31 DEPARTED GAI WITHOUT ATC RELEASE.
Narrative: WE DEPARTED GAI WITHOUT OBTAINING A RELEASE FOR OUR ATC CLRNC. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS INCLUDE THE CAPT MONITORING THE LCL FREQ DURING THE ISSUANCE OF THE CLRNC, LACK OF FAMILIARITY WITH PROCS CONCERNING IFR DEPS FROM UNCTLED FIELDS ON THE PART OF THE FO, AND THE CAPT'S FAILURE TO PROPERLY MONITOR THE CLRNC PROCESS. ONCE AIRBORNE, A CLRNC WAS RECEIVED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT, AND THE PORTION OF THE FLT WAS CONDUCTED UNDER VFR CONDITIONS. TO RECTIFY THIS SIT, EMPHASIS SHOULD BE PLACED IN TRAINING ON CLRNC PROCS, AND THE PROCS THEMSELVES COULD POSSIBLY BE SIMPLIFIED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.