37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 573055 |
Time | |
Date | 200302 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : tys.airport |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | agl single value : 800 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Weather Elements | Windshear |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : tys.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65, Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : go around |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 14691 flight time type : 1416 |
ASRS Report | 573055 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : overshoot inflight encounter : weather non adherence : clearance other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | aircraft : automation overrode flight crew controller : issued new clearance flight crew : returned to assigned altitude flight crew : became reoriented flight crew : executed go around flight crew : exited adverse environment flight crew : overrode automation |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
The first officer was flying a visual approach to runway 23L, knoxville airport. On short final, we got a windshear alert on our pfd's. The first officer executed a missed approach with the proper calls. I was responding to the missed approach calls and also communicating with ATC. When I called the tower and told them of the missed approach, the tower cleared us to 4000 ft, and changed us to approach control. After cleaning up the aircraft and changing frequencys, I noticed we were climbing through 4000 ft at a good rate of climb. I told the first officer to level at 4000 ft. The first officer kept repeating that the aircraft was not responding. I told him to push the nose down and level at 4000 ft. Again he said the aircraft was not responding. The aircraft had climbed to 5000 ft, at which time I took control of the aircraft and descended to 4000 ft. We returned to the airport and landed without further incident. When on the ground, I asked the first officer why he didn't level at 4000 ft and why he kept saying that the aircraft was not responding, as it flew fine. He said that he thought the autoplt was engaged, so during the missed approach, he was pushing the buttons on the fcp, but nothing was happening. The first officer had become engrossed with why the autoplt was not doing what he was telling it to do. He had become focused on the automation and it never occurred to him to hand fly the aircraft. I was late in taking control of the aircraft because of talking on the radios and performing PNF duties. This incident happened late at night. We both had been on duty for 11+ hours, and it was our 5TH leg of the day. Automation is great, but if it's not doing what you want, you must take control.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EXECUTING A GAR AT TYS DUE TO WINDSHEAR ALERT, CARJ-200 FO BECOMES FOCUSED WITH INCORRECT AUTOPLT OP, OVERSHOOTS ASSIGNED ALT, REQUIRING CAPT TO TAKE ACFT CTL.
Narrative: THE FO WAS FLYING A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 23L, KNOXVILLE ARPT. ON SHORT FINAL, WE GOT A WINDSHEAR ALERT ON OUR PFD'S. THE FO EXECUTED A MISSED APCH WITH THE PROPER CALLS. I WAS RESPONDING TO THE MISSED APCH CALLS AND ALSO COMMUNICATING WITH ATC. WHEN I CALLED THE TWR AND TOLD THEM OF THE MISSED APCH, THE TWR CLRED US TO 4000 FT, AND CHANGED US TO APCH CTL. AFTER CLEANING UP THE ACFT AND CHANGING FREQS, I NOTICED WE WERE CLBING THROUGH 4000 FT AT A GOOD RATE OF CLB. I TOLD THE FO TO LEVEL AT 4000 FT. THE FO KEPT REPEATING THAT THE ACFT WAS NOT RESPONDING. I TOLD HIM TO PUSH THE NOSE DOWN AND LEVEL AT 4000 FT. AGAIN HE SAID THE ACFT WAS NOT RESPONDING. THE ACFT HAD CLBED TO 5000 FT, AT WHICH TIME I TOOK CTL OF THE ACFT AND DSNDED TO 4000 FT. WE RETURNED TO THE ARPT AND LANDED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. WHEN ON THE GND, I ASKED THE FO WHY HE DIDN'T LEVEL AT 4000 FT AND WHY HE KEPT SAYING THAT THE ACFT WAS NOT RESPONDING, AS IT FLEW FINE. HE SAID THAT HE THOUGHT THE AUTOPLT WAS ENGAGED, SO DURING THE MISSED APCH, HE WAS PUSHING THE BUTTONS ON THE FCP, BUT NOTHING WAS HAPPENING. THE FO HAD BECOME ENGROSSED WITH WHY THE AUTOPLT WAS NOT DOING WHAT HE WAS TELLING IT TO DO. HE HAD BECOME FOCUSED ON THE AUTOMATION AND IT NEVER OCCURRED TO HIM TO HAND FLY THE ACFT. I WAS LATE IN TAKING CTL OF THE ACFT BECAUSE OF TALKING ON THE RADIOS AND PERFORMING PNF DUTIES. THIS INCIDENT HAPPENED LATE AT NIGHT. WE BOTH HAD BEEN ON DUTY FOR 11+ HRS, AND IT WAS OUR 5TH LEG OF THE DAY. AUTOMATION IS GREAT, BUT IF IT'S NOT DOING WHAT YOU WANT, YOU MUST TAKE CTL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.