37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 576446 |
Time | |
Date | 200303 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : 9b1.airport |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skylane 182/RG Turbo Skylane/RG |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 950 flight time type : 60 |
ASRS Report | 576446 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground critical excursion : runway ground encounters other inflight encounter : weather inflight encounter other non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | other other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
My student and I were on a training flight, working on pilotage and short field lndgs. Lndgs had been made at previous airports along with the airport at which the incident occurred. Weight and balance calculations had been completed along with takeoff and landing performance calculations for each airport of intended use. The event occurred on the third full stop taxi back landing at 9b1. Full short field procedures were followed by the student, and airspeed was properly held throughout. On short final to runway 32, descent rate began to decrease, and it was determined we may have picked up a slight tailwind. Our approach became too high into 9b1, and we landed just prior to midfield. There was plenty of room to do a go around, which was what I, the instructor, was planning on doing. We had passed the go around point on the runway, however, when we touched down. The student froze at the controls and locked the brakes up. I told him to 'release the brakes,' but he did not comply. I then ordered him to 'clear the controls.' I had to push his hand off the throttle to get him to release, at which point he also released his feet from the brakes. There was a fence at the end of the runway, which we impacted lightly. At no time was there a go around by the student, or when I finally got control of the aircraft, attempted. No one was injured and damage was a bent propeller and spinner. When I finally got control of the aircraft, a go around would have not been possible, due to a pond and house at the end of the runway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A C182T PLT, INSTRUCTING A STUDENT ON SOFT FIELD LNDGS AT 9B1, DID NOT TAKE CTL OF THE ACFT IN TIME TO PREVENT RUNNING OFF OF THE END OF THE RWY AND IMPACTING A FENCE.
Narrative: MY STUDENT AND I WERE ON A TRAINING FLT, WORKING ON PILOTAGE AND SHORT FIELD LNDGS. LNDGS HAD BEEN MADE AT PREVIOUS ARPTS ALONG WITH THE ARPT AT WHICH THE INCIDENT OCCURRED. WT AND BAL CALCULATIONS HAD BEEN COMPLETED ALONG WITH TKOF AND LNDG PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH ARPT OF INTENDED USE. THE EVENT OCCURRED ON THE THIRD FULL STOP TAXI BACK LNDG AT 9B1. FULL SHORT FIELD PROCS WERE FOLLOWED BY THE STUDENT, AND AIRSPD WAS PROPERLY HELD THROUGHOUT. ON SHORT FINAL TO RWY 32, DSCNT RATE BEGAN TO DECREASE, AND IT WAS DETERMINED WE MAY HAVE PICKED UP A SLIGHT TAILWIND. OUR APCH BECAME TOO HIGH INTO 9B1, AND WE LANDED JUST PRIOR TO MIDFIELD. THERE WAS PLENTY OF ROOM TO DO A GAR, WHICH WAS WHAT I, THE INSTRUCTOR, WAS PLANNING ON DOING. WE HAD PASSED THE GAR POINT ON THE RWY, HOWEVER, WHEN WE TOUCHED DOWN. THE STUDENT FROZE AT THE CTLS AND LOCKED THE BRAKES UP. I TOLD HIM TO 'RELEASE THE BRAKES,' BUT HE DID NOT COMPLY. I THEN ORDERED HIM TO 'CLR THE CTLS.' I HAD TO PUSH HIS HAND OFF THE THROTTLE TO GET HIM TO RELEASE, AT WHICH POINT HE ALSO RELEASED HIS FEET FROM THE BRAKES. THERE WAS A FENCE AT THE END OF THE RWY, WHICH WE IMPACTED LIGHTLY. AT NO TIME WAS THERE A GAR BY THE STUDENT, OR WHEN I FINALLY GOT CTL OF THE ACFT, ATTEMPTED. NO ONE WAS INJURED AND DAMAGE WAS A BENT PROP AND SPINNER. WHEN I FINALLY GOT CTL OF THE ACFT, A GAR WOULD HAVE NOT BEEN POSSIBLE, DUE TO A POND AND HOUSE AT THE END OF THE RWY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.