37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 577066 |
Time | |
Date | 200303 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sfo.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Weather Elements | Rain |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : nct.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : charted visual approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 577066 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
We were being vectored down the bay for a visual approach to runway 28R at sfo. The FMS bridge visual approach has been left out of our database, so we had setup and briefed for the quiet bridge runway 28L/right approach. ATIS was calling for a 5000 ft ceiling and 6 mi visibility in light rain showers. 'Charted' visual approachs were in use. At 2500 ft on a vector to the airport, we were still in and out of the clouds and could see the san mateo bridge, but no runway or airport. Approach descended us to 1500 ft and kept asking if we had the runway in sight -- we replied in the negative. Approach asked us to tune in and join the localizer for runway 28R, but he did not change our heading. The ILS was already set, but there was not time to reprogram the FMC and rebrief the approach as required by our fom. As I keyed the microphone to ask for a delay vector, I saw the runway and VASI at 1 O'clock. An uneventful landing was made. The WX (ie, rain showers) were restricting the visibility, and they were still attempting visual approachs. This put us in an uncomfortable position for a few seconds. I should have asked to be boxed around for an ILS approach when he asked me to join the localizer.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B757 LNDG SFO EXPERIENCED MARGINAL WX DURING VISUAL APCH.
Narrative: WE WERE BEING VECTORED DOWN THE BAY FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 28R AT SFO. THE FMS BRIDGE VISUAL APCH HAS BEEN LEFT OUT OF OUR DATABASE, SO WE HAD SETUP AND BRIEFED FOR THE QUIET BRIDGE RWY 28L/R APCH. ATIS WAS CALLING FOR A 5000 FT CEILING AND 6 MI VISIBILITY IN LIGHT RAIN SHOWERS. 'CHARTED' VISUAL APCHS WERE IN USE. AT 2500 FT ON A VECTOR TO THE ARPT, WE WERE STILL IN AND OUT OF THE CLOUDS AND COULD SEE THE SAN MATEO BRIDGE, BUT NO RWY OR ARPT. APCH DSNDED US TO 1500 FT AND KEPT ASKING IF WE HAD THE RWY IN SIGHT -- WE REPLIED IN THE NEGATIVE. APCH ASKED US TO TUNE IN AND JOIN THE LOC FOR RWY 28R, BUT HE DID NOT CHANGE OUR HDG. THE ILS WAS ALREADY SET, BUT THERE WAS NOT TIME TO REPROGRAM THE FMC AND REBRIEF THE APCH AS REQUIRED BY OUR FOM. AS I KEYED THE MIKE TO ASK FOR A DELAY VECTOR, I SAW THE RWY AND VASI AT 1 O'CLOCK. AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG WAS MADE. THE WX (IE, RAIN SHOWERS) WERE RESTRICTING THE VISIBILITY, AND THEY WERE STILL ATTEMPTING VISUAL APCHS. THIS PUT US IN AN UNCOMFORTABLE POS FOR A FEW SECONDS. I SHOULD HAVE ASKED TO BE BOXED AROUND FOR AN ILS APCH WHEN HE ASKED ME TO JOIN THE LOC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.