Narrative:

During station visit by FAA inspector, it was brought to management's attention that I was not qualified as a line inspector due to not having an eye examination. In 14 yrs of inspecting, I have never had an eye examination, and I am not a full-time line inspector. (Air carrier has eye exams on file for my other qualifications.) air carrier gn/MM manuals and maintenance head of inspection, state that it is not required for the scope of inspections that I accomplish. The FAA inspector insists otherwise. If this is the case, then none of the hundreds of inspections I have accomplished (since june of 1989) with air carrier are legal. The most recent being on aircraft X on mar/thu/03 ('K' check).

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A LINE INSPECTOR RPTS DISQUALIFICATION OF INSPECTION AUTH BY THE FAA DUE TO NO RECORD OF EYE EXAMINATION. CARRIER MANUAL STATES NO EXAM REQUIRED DUE TO SCOPE OF INSPECTION.

Narrative: DURING STATION VISIT BY FAA INSPECTOR, IT WAS BROUGHT TO MGMNT'S ATTN THAT I WAS NOT QUALIFIED AS A LINE INSPECTOR DUE TO NOT HAVING AN EYE EXAM. IN 14 YRS OF INSPECTING, I HAVE NEVER HAD AN EYE EXAM, AND I AM NOT A FULL-TIME LINE INSPECTOR. (ACR HAS EYE EXAMS ON FILE FOR MY OTHER QUALIFICATIONS.) ACR GN/MM MANUALS AND MAINT HEAD OF INSPECTION, STATE THAT IT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SCOPE OF INSPECTIONS THAT I ACCOMPLISH. THE FAA INSPECTOR INSISTS OTHERWISE. IF THIS IS THE CASE, THEN NONE OF THE HUNDREDS OF INSPECTIONS I HAVE ACCOMPLISHED (SINCE JUNE OF 1989) WITH ACR ARE LEGAL. THE MOST RECENT BEING ON ACFT X ON MAR/THU/03 ('K' CHK).

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.