37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 581506 |
Time | |
Date | 200305 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : flo.airport |
State Reference | SC |
Altitude | msl single value : 6000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : flo.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : flo.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 167 flight time total : 798 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 581506 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical conflict : nmac non adherence : far non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued alert flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 500 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
I was on an IFR flight plan from ilm to ays, level at 6000 ft MSL. When I first checked in with florence approach, the controller said he wasn't picking up my transponder. A few moments later he said he was receiving my transponder and altitude readout. As I was approaching flo VOR on V139 the controller asked me what altitude I was at. I replied 'level 6000 ft.' then the controller called to the other airplane 'traffic...' and did not complete his call. I immediately saw an airplane head on approaching from my 11 O'clock position and took evasive action, missing the aircraft by less than 500 ft horizontal and zero ft vertical. The other aircraft was a C172 or C182 and passed off my left wing. The other aircraft called 'traffic in sight and they are veering off.' the controller then canceled flight advisories with the other aircraft. I believe they had VFR flight following. At no time did I receive TA's of any kind. The controller then handed me off to shaw approach once I was established on V157. Previously I did hear the florence controller mention on the radio that he was having potential difficulty with his equipment but he never mentioned it to me. My concern is intermittent approach control equipment and the possibility that this approach controller was not performing his full responsibility and duties required. My evasive action was a prompt 60 degree bank to the right until collision avoidance was certain.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 IFR ENRTE HAS NMAC WITH VFR ACFT ON ATC FREQ.
Narrative: I WAS ON AN IFR FLT PLAN FROM ILM TO AYS, LEVEL AT 6000 FT MSL. WHEN I FIRST CHKED IN WITH FLORENCE APCH, THE CTLR SAID HE WASN'T PICKING UP MY XPONDER. A FEW MOMENTS LATER HE SAID HE WAS RECEIVING MY XPONDER AND ALT READOUT. AS I WAS APCHING FLO VOR ON V139 THE CTLR ASKED ME WHAT ALT I WAS AT. I REPLIED 'LEVEL 6000 FT.' THEN THE CTLR CALLED TO THE OTHER AIRPLANE 'TFC...' AND DID NOT COMPLETE HIS CALL. I IMMEDIATELY SAW AN AIRPLANE HEAD ON APCHING FROM MY 11 O'CLOCK POS AND TOOK EVASIVE ACTION, MISSING THE ACFT BY LESS THAN 500 FT HORIZ AND ZERO FT VERT. THE OTHER ACFT WAS A C172 OR C182 AND PASSED OFF MY L WING. THE OTHER ACFT CALLED 'TFC IN SIGHT AND THEY ARE VEERING OFF.' THE CTLR THEN CANCELED FLT ADVISORIES WITH THE OTHER ACFT. I BELIEVE THEY HAD VFR FLT FOLLOWING. AT NO TIME DID I RECEIVE TA'S OF ANY KIND. THE CTLR THEN HANDED ME OFF TO SHAW APCH ONCE I WAS ESTABLISHED ON V157. PREVIOUSLY I DID HEAR THE FLORENCE CTLR MENTION ON THE RADIO THAT HE WAS HAVING POTENTIAL DIFFICULTY WITH HIS EQUIP BUT HE NEVER MENTIONED IT TO ME. MY CONCERN IS INTERMITTENT APCH CTL EQUIP AND THE POSSIBILITY THAT THIS APCH CTLR WAS NOT PERFORMING HIS FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND DUTIES REQUIRED. MY EVASIVE ACTION WAS A PROMPT 60 DEG BANK TO THE R UNTIL COLLISION AVOIDANCE WAS CERTAIN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.