37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 582119 |
Time | |
Date | 200305 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mem.airport |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | agl single value : 200 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mem.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 36l other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : go around |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mem.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : position and hold |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 2400 flight time type : 1885 |
ASRS Report | 582119 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : executed go around flight crew : executed missed approach flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : exited adverse environment |
Miss Distance | vertical : 200 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Environmental Factor ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
I was flying from dfw to mem. We got clearance for ILS runway 36L in IFR conditions. At the time mem was being controled by 1 local controller for the entire airport. Once we received landing clearance and established inside the FAF, mem opened a second local controller for the west side of the airport (runway 36L). We never received notification to switch frequency since we were with the east side controller. Tower told us before FAF to expect 1 departure prior to our arrival. When we broke out of the clouds on ILS runway 36L, we saw another airplane on the runway (an A320). We never heard his takeoff clearance since the tower had split the frequencys and we were on the east side frequency on the west side runway. Upon reaching 200 ft AGL and the other airplane still on the runway, we executed missed approach. The controller was startled since he was controling the east side of the airport. We did not receive immediate instructions so I began to execute the published missed approach per ILS runway 36L instrument approach procedure. The captain (who was the PNF) told the tower that was 'on the go' instead of using standard ATC phraseology, which further confused the controller. We finally received instructions from ATC to climb to 2000 ft and turn 190 degree heading. Came back around and did ILS runway 36L without incident followed by uneventful landing.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: WHILE ON APCH TO THE MEM W SIDE, A CL65 CREW NOTICED THE LCL FREQ WAS SPLIT LEAVING THEM ON THE E SIDE FREQ.
Narrative: I WAS FLYING FROM DFW TO MEM. WE GOT CLRNC FOR ILS RWY 36L IN IFR CONDITIONS. AT THE TIME MEM WAS BEING CTLED BY 1 LCL CTLR FOR THE ENTIRE ARPT. ONCE WE RECEIVED LNDG CLRNC AND ESTABLISHED INSIDE THE FAF, MEM OPENED A SECOND LCL CTLR FOR THE W SIDE OF THE ARPT (RWY 36L). WE NEVER RECEIVED NOTIFICATION TO SWITCH FREQ SINCE WE WERE WITH THE E SIDE CTLR. TWR TOLD US BEFORE FAF TO EXPECT 1 DEP PRIOR TO OUR ARR. WHEN WE BROKE OUT OF THE CLOUDS ON ILS RWY 36L, WE SAW ANOTHER AIRPLANE ON THE RWY (AN A320). WE NEVER HEARD HIS TKOF CLRNC SINCE THE TWR HAD SPLIT THE FREQS AND WE WERE ON THE E SIDE FREQ ON THE W SIDE RWY. UPON REACHING 200 FT AGL AND THE OTHER AIRPLANE STILL ON THE RWY, WE EXECUTED MISSED APCH. THE CTLR WAS STARTLED SINCE HE WAS CTLING THE E SIDE OF THE ARPT. WE DID NOT RECEIVE IMMEDIATE INSTRUCTIONS SO I BEGAN TO EXECUTE THE PUBLISHED MISSED APCH PER ILS RWY 36L INST APCH PROC. THE CAPT (WHO WAS THE PNF) TOLD THE TWR THAT WAS 'ON THE GO' INSTEAD OF USING STANDARD ATC PHRASEOLOGY, WHICH FURTHER CONFUSED THE CTLR. WE FINALLY RECEIVED INSTRUCTIONS FROM ATC TO CLB TO 2000 FT AND TURN 190 DEG HDG. CAME BACK AROUND AND DID ILS RWY 36L WITHOUT INCIDENT FOLLOWED BY UNEVENTFUL LNDG.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.