 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
An A320 PIC forgets to advise ATC that they are unable to accept any lahso assignment when planning an approach and landing to runway 9R at ord, il.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 582716 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200305 |
| Day | Thu |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : ord.airport |
| State Reference | IL |
| Altitude | msl single value : 3000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : ord.tower |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | A320 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Navigation In Use | other |
| Flight Phase | landing : roll landing other |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 175 flight time total : 14000 flight time type : 1080 |
| ASRS Report | 582716 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : company policies non adherence : published procedure |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Aircraft Airport Flight Crew Human Performance Company |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
At the time of our arrival to ord, ATIS advised of land and hold short operations being conducted. ATIS also advised to inform approach control and tower if unable to accept lahso. Approach control was very busy with inbound aircraft. I made 3 attempts to contact approach control before they acknowledged. I forgot to advise approach control we were unable to accept lahso due to flight manual prohibition for runway 9R. We contacted tower on 5 mi final and they advised us to hold short taxiway south at far end of runway 9R. We accepted this landing clearance and made an uneventful landing on runway 9R. Although, the landing was routine with no other aircraft on or close to our runway 9R, I did accept the clearance, forgetting to advise approach control and tower that we were unable to lahso. In the future, I will be more alert about lahso clrncs, especially during heavy traffic and degraded controller/pilot communications.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN A320 PIC FORGETS TO ADVISE ATC THAT THEY ARE UNABLE TO ACCEPT ANY LAHSO ASSIGNMENT WHEN PLANNING AN APCH AND LNDG TO RWY 9R AT ORD, IL.
Narrative: AT THE TIME OF OUR ARR TO ORD, ATIS ADVISED OF LAND AND HOLD SHORT OPS BEING CONDUCTED. ATIS ALSO ADVISED TO INFORM APCH CTL AND TWR IF UNABLE TO ACCEPT LAHSO. APCH CTL WAS VERY BUSY WITH INBOUND ACFT. I MADE 3 ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT APCH CTL BEFORE THEY ACKNOWLEDGED. I FORGOT TO ADVISE APCH CTL WE WERE UNABLE TO ACCEPT LAHSO DUE TO FLT MANUAL PROHIBITION FOR RWY 9R. WE CONTACTED TWR ON 5 MI FINAL AND THEY ADVISED US TO HOLD SHORT TXWY S AT FAR END OF RWY 9R. WE ACCEPTED THIS LNDG CLRNC AND MADE AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG ON RWY 9R. ALTHOUGH, THE LNDG WAS ROUTINE WITH NO OTHER ACFT ON OR CLOSE TO OUR RWY 9R, I DID ACCEPT THE CLRNC, FORGETTING TO ADVISE APCH CTL AND TWR THAT WE WERE UNABLE TO LAHSO. IN THE FUTURE, I WILL BE MORE ALERT ABOUT LAHSO CLRNCS, ESPECIALLY DURING HVY TFC AND DEGRADED CTLR/PLT COMS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.