Narrative:

Approaching lubbock, decided on localizer back course 35. Briefed approach. While still out from the airport, the controller queried us as to whether we still wanted runway 35 because of the NOTAM on ATIS. Nothing was mentioned on the ATIS about NOTAMS. After verifying the ATIS and the WX packet, the shortened runway was verified. We lnded runway 26 uneventfully. I will say that if we had made the approach, we would have noticed the partial runway closure and gone around. My contribution to this scenario is not checking the NOTAMS myself.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLT CREW OF B737-200 FAILED TO NOTE NOTAM REGARDING PARTIAL RWY CLOSURE AT LBB. CTLR CALLED IT TO THEIR ATTN AND THEY CHOSE TO LAND ON ANOTHER RWY.

Narrative: APCHING LUBBOCK, DECIDED ON LOC BACK COURSE 35. BRIEFED APCH. WHILE STILL OUT FROM THE ARPT, THE CTLR QUERIED US AS TO WHETHER WE STILL WANTED RWY 35 BECAUSE OF THE NOTAM ON ATIS. NOTHING WAS MENTIONED ON THE ATIS ABOUT NOTAMS. AFTER VERIFYING THE ATIS AND THE WX PACKET, THE SHORTENED RWY WAS VERIFIED. WE LNDED RWY 26 UNEVENTFULLY. I WILL SAY THAT IF WE HAD MADE THE APCH, WE WOULD HAVE NOTICED THE PARTIAL RWY CLOSURE AND GONE AROUND. MY CONTRIBUTION TO THIS SCENARIO IS NOT CHKING THE NOTAMS MYSELF.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.