37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 593978 |
Time | |
Date | 200309 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : pdx.airport |
State Reference | OR |
Altitude | msl single value : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : pdx.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | PA-31 Navajo Chieftan/Mojave/Navajo T1020 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern arrival : vfr |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : pdx.tower |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Gulfstream IV |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 1400 flight time type : 150 |
ASRS Report | 593978 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : insufficient time |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Environmental Factor Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
I was instructed by pdx control tower to 'cross midfield at 2000 ft for left downwind runway 28L.' runway 28L&right are staggered by at least 3000 ft (runway 28L extends further west than runway 28R). As I crossed from north to south as instructed, midfield for left downwind runway 28L, a departing G4 on runway 28R crossed underneath me. I never saw the G4 until he was directly underneath my aircraft. The control tower was using only 1 of their 2 frequencys during peak arrival and departure times thus leaving the tower extremely busy. After the G4 passed below me, he reported the near miss to tower. I believe there were several contributing factors: 1) the staggered runways of 28L&right can create many 'midfield' crossing areas. What is considered midfield at pdx? 2) the rate of climb of the G4 and my airspeed were miscalculated by tower. 3) the tower never announced TA's to myself or the G4, not even after it was too late. My observation was that I crossed 'midfield' and complied with tower's instructions as stated. After the incident, on the ground talking with the control tower supervisor, he told myself and my assistant chief pilot that they (tower) never saw the conflict because they (tower) were looking the opposite direction.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: INBOUND VFR PA31 AND DEPARTING GLF4 HAVE NMAC OVERHEAD PDX.
Narrative: I WAS INSTRUCTED BY PDX CTL TWR TO 'CROSS MIDFIELD AT 2000 FT FOR L DOWNWIND RWY 28L.' RWY 28L&R ARE STAGGERED BY AT LEAST 3000 FT (RWY 28L EXTENDS FURTHER W THAN RWY 28R). AS I CROSSED FROM N TO S AS INSTRUCTED, MIDFIELD FOR L DOWNWIND RWY 28L, A DEPARTING G4 ON RWY 28R CROSSED UNDERNEATH ME. I NEVER SAW THE G4 UNTIL HE WAS DIRECTLY UNDERNEATH MY ACFT. THE CTL TWR WAS USING ONLY 1 OF THEIR 2 FREQS DURING PEAK ARR AND DEP TIMES THUS LEAVING THE TWR EXTREMELY BUSY. AFTER THE G4 PASSED BELOW ME, HE RPTED THE NEAR MISS TO TWR. I BELIEVE THERE WERE SEVERAL CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: 1) THE STAGGERED RWYS OF 28L&R CAN CREATE MANY 'MIDFIELD' XING AREAS. WHAT IS CONSIDERED MIDFIELD AT PDX? 2) THE RATE OF CLB OF THE G4 AND MY AIRSPD WERE MISCALCULATED BY TWR. 3) THE TWR NEVER ANNOUNCED TA'S TO MYSELF OR THE G4, NOT EVEN AFTER IT WAS TOO LATE. MY OBSERVATION WAS THAT I CROSSED 'MIDFIELD' AND COMPLIED WITH TWR'S INSTRUCTIONS AS STATED. AFTER THE INCIDENT, ON THE GND TALKING WITH THE CTL TWR SUPVR, HE TOLD MYSELF AND MY ASSISTANT CHIEF PLT THAT THEY (TWR) NEVER SAW THE CONFLICT BECAUSE THEY (TWR) WERE LOOKING THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.