37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 595737 |
Time | |
Date | 200310 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
State Reference | MT |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | PA-46 Malibu |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | landing : roll |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Amateur (Home) Built |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 178 flight time total : 8000 flight time type : 3000 |
ASRS Report | 595737 |
Person 2 | |
Function | observation : passenger |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : obs 2 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
I am a CFI specializing in initial and recurrent training in high-performance, pressurized aircraft. On oct/fri/03, I was repositioning a customer's PA46-310P malibu from missoula (mso), mt, to polson (8s1, uncontrolled), mt, to pick up the airplane owner and then conduct flight training. Earlier in the day, I had been flying the same airplane out of missoula with another student. The WX was good VFR with almost unlimited ceiling and visibility. For the short (47 NM) flight to polson, I did not file any flight plan. I arrived at polson at approximately XA30 local time and entered a left pattern for runway 36. I announced my position at the downwind, base and final legs on the unicom frequency of 122.8, which was not monitored. After landing, the owner of the airplane came over to the airplane and informed me he had just found out that the runway was closed due to resealing of some cracks. Incidentally, the runway looked normal and did not have any damage. While we were talking, another airplane (an experimental kis homebuilt) landed on the same runway 36, without making any position reports. After talking to the airplane owner about the runway closure, I decided to leave the airport. I took off from runway 36 and flew to ronan, a few mi away, where we kept the airplane for the night. After taking off from runway 36 at polton, I flew over the airport to see if I could notice any crosses indicating the runway closure. There were no crosses on the paved runway, but there were yellow plastic crosses (repositioned somewhat by the wind) in the grassy area in front of the threshold of each runway. I found this method of indicating a closed runway confusing and, obviously, other pilots had made the same mistake. Indeed, the following day, flying from ronan, we advised a bonanza pilot not to land at polson, as he had not noticed the crosses nor heard of the runway closure. Notwithstanding all the attenuating circumstances, I landed on a runway where I should not have landed. To prevent a reoccurrence in the future, I will check all the NOTAMS even for the shortest of flts, and file at least a VFR flight plan. I learned a valuable lesson as well.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: UNAUTH LNDG BY A PA46-310P CFI ON A CLOSED RWY AT A NON TWRED ARPT AT 8S1, MT.
Narrative: I AM A CFI SPECIALIZING IN INITIAL AND RECURRENT TRAINING IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE, PRESSURIZED ACFT. ON OCT/FRI/03, I WAS REPOSITIONING A CUSTOMER'S PA46-310P MALIBU FROM MISSOULA (MSO), MT, TO POLSON (8S1, UNCTLED), MT, TO PICK UP THE AIRPLANE OWNER AND THEN CONDUCT FLT TRAINING. EARLIER IN THE DAY, I HAD BEEN FLYING THE SAME AIRPLANE OUT OF MISSOULA WITH ANOTHER STUDENT. THE WX WAS GOOD VFR WITH ALMOST UNLIMITED CEILING AND VISIBILITY. FOR THE SHORT (47 NM) FLT TO POLSON, I DID NOT FILE ANY FLT PLAN. I ARRIVED AT POLSON AT APPROX XA30 LCL TIME AND ENTERED A L PATTERN FOR RWY 36. I ANNOUNCED MY POS AT THE DOWNWIND, BASE AND FINAL LEGS ON THE UNICOM FREQ OF 122.8, WHICH WAS NOT MONITORED. AFTER LNDG, THE OWNER OF THE AIRPLANE CAME OVER TO THE AIRPLANE AND INFORMED ME HE HAD JUST FOUND OUT THAT THE RWY WAS CLOSED DUE TO RESEALING OF SOME CRACKS. INCIDENTALLY, THE RWY LOOKED NORMAL AND DID NOT HAVE ANY DAMAGE. WHILE WE WERE TALKING, ANOTHER AIRPLANE (AN EXPERIMENTAL KIS HOMEBUILT) LANDED ON THE SAME RWY 36, WITHOUT MAKING ANY POS RPTS. AFTER TALKING TO THE AIRPLANE OWNER ABOUT THE RWY CLOSURE, I DECIDED TO LEAVE THE ARPT. I TOOK OFF FROM RWY 36 AND FLEW TO RONAN, A FEW MI AWAY, WHERE WE KEPT THE AIRPLANE FOR THE NIGHT. AFTER TAKING OFF FROM RWY 36 AT POLTON, I FLEW OVER THE ARPT TO SEE IF I COULD NOTICE ANY CROSSES INDICATING THE RWY CLOSURE. THERE WERE NO CROSSES ON THE PAVED RWY, BUT THERE WERE YELLOW PLASTIC CROSSES (REPOSITIONED SOMEWHAT BY THE WIND) IN THE GRASSY AREA IN FRONT OF THE THRESHOLD OF EACH RWY. I FOUND THIS METHOD OF INDICATING A CLOSED RWY CONFUSING AND, OBVIOUSLY, OTHER PLTS HAD MADE THE SAME MISTAKE. INDEED, THE FOLLOWING DAY, FLYING FROM RONAN, WE ADVISED A BONANZA PLT NOT TO LAND AT POLSON, AS HE HAD NOT NOTICED THE CROSSES NOR HEARD OF THE RWY CLOSURE. NOTWITHSTANDING ALL THE ATTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES, I LANDED ON A RWY WHERE I SHOULD NOT HAVE LANDED. TO PREVENT A REOCCURRENCE IN THE FUTURE, I WILL CHK ALL THE NOTAMS EVEN FOR THE SHORTEST OF FLTS, AND FILE AT LEAST A VFR FLT PLAN. I LEARNED A VALUABLE LESSON AS WELL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.