37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 601887 |
Time | |
Date | 200312 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : srq.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : tpa.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | PA-46 Malibu |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 5300 flight time type : 800 |
ASRS Report | 601887 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Environmental Factor Airspace Structure ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : tpa.tracon |
Narrative:
On approach, I broke out below ceiling at about 2500 ft. At distance of about 8 mi (heading about 270 degrees toward airport), I called to report 'airport in sight.' approach continued to give vectors to a close-in right base to runway 32. On base leg, with about 2 mi to go to final, approach called with instructions to 'maintain heading until intercepting final, cleared for visual approach.' at that time, I became occupied with intercepting GS and localizer and with completing the checklist. I landed and turned off and realized I had not gotten a clearance to land from tower. Tampa approach never told me to contact tower. As a single-pilot I need that one because I am busy at that time in the flight. Controllers at tampa approach frequently vector aircraft on to the final and fail to tell pilots to contact tower. Approach controllers should always tell pilots to contact tower at the appropriate point on the approach. With tampa approach, this frequently doesn't happen.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A PA46 SINGLE PLT LANDS SRQ ON APCH FREQ.
Narrative: ON APCH, I BROKE OUT BELOW CEILING AT ABOUT 2500 FT. AT DISTANCE OF ABOUT 8 MI (HEADING ABOUT 270 DEGS TOWARD ARPT), I CALLED TO RPT 'ARPT IN SIGHT.' APCH CONTINUED TO GIVE VECTORS TO A CLOSE-IN R BASE TO RWY 32. ON BASE LEG, WITH ABOUT 2 MI TO GO TO FINAL, APCH CALLED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO 'MAINTAIN HEADING UNTIL INTERCEPTING FINAL, CLRED FOR VISUAL APCH.' AT THAT TIME, I BECAME OCCUPIED WITH INTERCEPTING GS AND LOC AND WITH COMPLETING THE CHKLIST. I LANDED AND TURNED OFF AND REALIZED I HAD NOT GOTTEN A CLRNC TO LAND FROM TWR. TAMPA APCH NEVER TOLD ME TO CONTACT TWR. AS A SINGLE-PLT I NEED THAT ONE BECAUSE I AM BUSY AT THAT TIME IN THE FLT. CTLRS AT TAMPA APCH FREQUENTLY VECTOR ACFT ON TO THE FINAL AND FAIL TO TELL PLTS TO CONTACT TWR. APCH CTLRS SHOULD ALWAYS TELL PLTS TO CONTACT TWR AT THE APPROPRIATE POINT ON THE APCH. WITH TAMPA APCH, THIS FREQUENTLY DOESN'T HAPPEN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.