37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 612738 |
Time | |
Date | 200403 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bos.airport |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | agl single value : 500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bos.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A319 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial climbout : takeoff ground : position and hold |
Route In Use | departure : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bos.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff climbout : initial ground : position and hold |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 612738 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe inflight encounter : wake turbulence non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : radar/mode c other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took precautionary avoidance action none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
Distraction by another aircraft, we failed to retract gear until we were into departure turn and above 500 ft AGL. As with most aviation distrs, one analyzes them after the fact in an effort to prevent them in the future. I understand my role and responsibility regarding this distraction and, whilst not diminishing it to nil, I find that I am most unhappy with ATC for unnecessarily putting us in the distraction state. Sequence of events follows: 1) taxi into position and hold on runway -- no one in front or behind us -- no flow restrs. 2) ATC taxied light aircraft into position and hold halfway down runway -- we could barely see it. 3) ATC informed us about intersection departure. 4) ATC cleared light aircraft for takeoff and straight out departure, 5) ATC cleared us for takeoff and immediate left turn to avoid slow aircraft on straight out departure. 6) both of us were immediately looking for light aircraft instead of retracting gear. The whole scenario was unnecessary. After already clearing us into position, there was no reason to get the light aircraft out in front of us. ATC has the big picture here. The smaller aircraft was not really visible to us and when it did become visible it looked pretty slow. Had we had an engine failure we would have been prevented from flying straight. We could have refused to take off, but we trusted ATC to have the big picture.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A319 CREW FAILED TO RETRACT GEAR AFTER TKOF BECAUSE OF A DISTR OF LOOKING FOR A LIGHT ACFT THAT WAS OFF AHEAD OF THEM.
Narrative: DISTR BY ANOTHER ACFT, WE FAILED TO RETRACT GEAR UNTIL WE WERE INTO DEP TURN AND ABOVE 500 FT AGL. AS WITH MOST AVIATION DISTRS, ONE ANALYZES THEM AFTER THE FACT IN AN EFFORT TO PREVENT THEM IN THE FUTURE. I UNDERSTAND MY ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY REGARDING THIS DISTR AND, WHILST NOT DIMINISHING IT TO NIL, I FIND THAT I AM MOST UNHAPPY WITH ATC FOR UNNECESSARILY PUTTING US IN THE DISTR STATE. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOLLOWS: 1) TAXI INTO POS AND HOLD ON RWY -- NO ONE IN FRONT OR BEHIND US -- NO FLOW RESTRS. 2) ATC TAXIED LIGHT ACFT INTO POS AND HOLD HALFWAY DOWN RWY -- WE COULD BARELY SEE IT. 3) ATC INFORMED US ABOUT INTXN DEP. 4) ATC CLRED LIGHT ACFT FOR TKOF AND STRAIGHT OUT DEP, 5) ATC CLRED US FOR TKOF AND IMMEDIATE L TURN TO AVOID SLOW ACFT ON STRAIGHT OUT DEP. 6) BOTH OF US WERE IMMEDIATELY LOOKING FOR LIGHT ACFT INSTEAD OF RETRACTING GEAR. THE WHOLE SCENARIO WAS UNNECESSARY. AFTER ALREADY CLRING US INTO POS, THERE WAS NO REASON TO GET THE LIGHT ACFT OUT IN FRONT OF US. ATC HAS THE BIG PICTURE HERE. THE SMALLER ACFT WAS NOT REALLY VISIBLE TO US AND WHEN IT DID BECOME VISIBLE IT LOOKED PRETTY SLOW. HAD WE HAD AN ENG FAILURE WE WOULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED FROM FLYING STRAIGHT. WE COULD HAVE REFUSED TO TAKE OFF, BUT WE TRUSTED ATC TO HAVE THE BIG PICTURE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.