37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 616257 |
Time | |
Date | 200404 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phx.airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 200 agl bound upper : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : p50.tracon tower : phx.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : go around |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 225 flight time total : 15397 flight time type : 5450 |
ASRS Report | 616257 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far non adherence : company policies other anomaly other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : executed go around |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance Aircraft Environmental Factor |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We were on a vector to runway 26 in phx. We were very high and close. Approach control asked if we saw the runway, we said we did. They then cleared us for the visual. We should have gone around at that point. We tried to make approach work. We were configured before 1000 ft AGL. About the time we crossed the approach lights, I noticed that the flaps were at 25 degrees. The flap handle was at 30 degrees, but the flaps indicated 25 degrees. We executed a go around. I don't know where in the approach the flaps blew up to 25 degrees. When I scanned the airspeed on the approach, it was always below maximum flap speed. Our landing weight was near maximum landing weight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GAR PERFORMED BY THE PIC OF A B737 AFTER A DESTABILIZED APCH FOR RWY 26 AT PHX, AZ.
Narrative: WE WERE ON A VECTOR TO RWY 26 IN PHX. WE WERE VERY HIGH AND CLOSE. APCH CTL ASKED IF WE SAW THE RWY, WE SAID WE DID. THEY THEN CLRED US FOR THE VISUAL. WE SHOULD HAVE GONE AROUND AT THAT POINT. WE TRIED TO MAKE APCH WORK. WE WERE CONFIGURED BEFORE 1000 FT AGL. ABOUT THE TIME WE CROSSED THE APCH LIGHTS, I NOTICED THAT THE FLAPS WERE AT 25 DEGS. THE FLAP HANDLE WAS AT 30 DEGS, BUT THE FLAPS INDICATED 25 DEGS. WE EXECUTED A GAR. I DON'T KNOW WHERE IN THE APCH THE FLAPS BLEW UP TO 25 DEGS. WHEN I SCANNED THE AIRSPD ON THE APCH, IT WAS ALWAYS BELOW MAX FLAP SPD. OUR LNDG WT WAS NEAR MAX LNDG WT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.