A C560 flight crew fail to meet a crossing restr on an approach into teb.

Attributes
ACN	616917
Time
Date	200405
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	intersection : dandy
State Reference	NJ
Altitude	msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 1700
Environment
Flight Conditions	Marginal
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : n90.tracon tower : ord.tower
Operator	general aviation : corporate
Make Model Name	Citation V
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Navigation In Use	ils localizer & glide slope : 6
Flight Phase	descent : intermediate altitude descent : approach
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 70 flight time total : 6950 flight time type : 2000
ASRS Report	616917
Person 2
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : multi engine pilot : cfi pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 17000 flight time type : 5000
ASRS Report	616918
Events
Anomaly	altitude deviation : crossing restriction not met altitude deviation : overshoot inflight encounter : weather non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Airspace Structure Weather Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

We briefed the approach approximately 25 mi from the airport when ATC assigned the runway. The first officer failed to point out the mandatory crossing restr at dandy intersection, and as I reviewed the approach plate, I also overlooked it. ATC cleared us for ILS runway 6 approach from approximately 4 mi southwest of vings at 2000 ft. I armed the approach mode and let the autoplt fly the localizer and GS, causing the missed mandatory crossing at dandy. ATC advised us of the problem shortly after we crossed dandy. Contributing to the problem is the extended low altitude flying while approaching teb. We were 75 mi from teb at 4000 ft. It was turbulence, MVFR, with a tremendous amount of VFR traffic in the area. Most of our time was spent looking for traffic, and due to the VFR landing conditions, not as much emphasis was placed on the instrument approach. Also, the controllers usually state 'cross vings at 2000 ft dandy at 1500 ft cleared ILS runway 6.' though not required, this statement would have prevented the altitude deviation. More crew attention should be given to the approach briefing even in VFR conditions.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A C560 FLT CREW FAIL TO MEET A XING RESTR ON AN APCH INTO TEB.

Narrative: WE BRIEFED THE APCH APPROX 25 MI FROM THE ARPT WHEN ATC ASSIGNED THE RWY. THE FO FAILED TO POINT OUT THE MANDATORY XING RESTR AT DANDY INTXN, AND AS I REVIEWED THE APCH PLATE, I ALSO OVERLOOKED IT. ATC CLRED US FOR ILS RWY 6 APCH FROM APPROX 4 MI SW OF VINGS AT 2000 FT. I ARMED THE APCH MODE AND LET THE AUTOPLT FLY THE LOC AND GS, CAUSING THE MISSED MANDATORY XING AT DANDY. ATC ADVISED US OF THE PROB SHORTLY AFTER WE CROSSED DANDY. CONTRIBUTING TO THE PROB IS THE EXTENDED LOW ALT FLYING WHILE APCHING TEB. WE WERE 75 MI FROM TEB AT 4000 FT. IT WAS TURB, MVFR, WITH A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF VFR TFC IN THE AREA. MOST OF OUR TIME WAS SPENT LOOKING FOR TFC, AND DUE TO THE VFR LNDG CONDITIONS, NOT AS MUCH EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON THE INST APCH. ALSO, THE CTLRS USUALLY STATE 'CROSS VINGS AT 2000 FT DANDY AT 1500 FT CLRED ILS RWY 6.' THOUGH NOT REQUIRED, THIS STATEMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE ALTDEV. MORE CREW ATTN SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE APCH BRIEFING EVEN IN VFR CONDITIONS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.