IFR BE40 departure from teb fails to comply with departure restr during runway 24 takeoff.

Attributes
ACN	638821
Time
Date	200411
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : teb.airport
State Reference	NJ
Altitude	msl single value : 1500
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Night
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : n90.tracon
Operator	general aviation : corporate
Make Model Name	Beechjet 400
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Flight Phase	climbout : intermediate altitude
Route In Use	departure sid : teb
Person 1
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 8300 flight time type : 1000
ASRS Report	638821
Person 2
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : first officer
Events
Anomaly	altitude deviation : overshoot non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	controller : issued advisory
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance Airspace Structure Chart Or Publication
Primary Problem	Company
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

I did not double check the departure procedure for runway 24 at teb. I had my first officer read the procedure to me, unfortunately, some key points were left out. Luckily, we did not have any conflicts with traffic at ewr. The controller corrected us and I learned a very valuable lesson. Always read the procedure myself and trust no one! Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter indicated that she utilizes teb on a very frequent basis and is familiar with the departure procedures. She said the first officer read the SID as they were taxiing out for departure, but failed to read or emphasize the key points, ie, altitude restr(south) and turn distances during the briefing. The reporter said she both missed the turn and overshot the altitude before being corrected by the controller, who cautioned the flight crew to 'look over' the procedure before takeoff. The reporter did not recall any FBO posters or alerts that covered the teb departure procedures. The reporter said the first officer failed to be complete in his briefing, but that the failure was ultimately her responsibility.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: IFR BE40 DEP FROM TEB FAILS TO COMPLY WITH DEP RESTR DURING RWY 24 TKOF.

Narrative: I DID NOT DOUBLE CHECK THE DEP PROC FOR RWY 24 AT TEB. I HAD MY FO READ THE PROC TO ME, UNFORTUNATELY, SOME KEY POINTS WERE LEFT OUT. LUCKILY, WE DID NOT HAVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TFC AT EWR. THE CTLR CORRECTED US AND I LEARNED A VERY VALUABLE LESSON. ALWAYS READ THE PROC MYSELF AND TRUST NO ONE! CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR INDICATED THAT SHE UTILIZES TEB ON A VERY FREQUENT BASIS AND IS FAMILIAR WITH THE DEP PROCS. SHE SAID THE FO READ THE SID AS THEY WERE TAXIING OUT FOR DEP, BUT FAILED TO READ OR EMPHASIZE THE KEY POINTS, IE, ALT RESTR(S) AND TURN DISTANCES DURING THE BRIEFING. THE RPTR SAID SHE BOTH MISSED THE TURN AND OVERSHOT THE ALT BEFORE BEING CORRECTED BY THE CTLR, WHO CAUTIONED THE FLT CREW TO 'LOOK OVER' THE PROC BEFORE TKOF. THE RPTR DID NOT RECALL ANY FBO POSTERS OR ALERTS THAT COVERED THE TEB DEP PROCS. THE RPTR SAID THE FO FAILED TO BE COMPLETE IN HIS BRIEFING, BUT THAT THE FAILURE WAS ULTIMATELY HER RESPONSIBILITY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.