37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 643281 |
Time | |
Date | 200412 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ase.airport |
State Reference | CO |
Altitude | msl single value : 9000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : ase.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Learjet 60 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : ase.tower |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Dassault-Breguet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure sid : lindz |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 140 flight time total : 3400 flight time type : 400 |
ASRS Report | 643281 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 7500 flight time type : 1500 |
ASRS Report | 641970 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : published procedure non adherence : company policies other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment : tcas other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 100 vertical : 150 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
We were on a visual approach to runway 15, behind another landing aircraft. The tower controller told us to stay west of the runway centerline for traffic. A falcon was taking off from runway 33 on the lindz 4 departure, after the falcon cleared the first aircraft, we were warned about the traffic, I responded that it was not in sight, and the controller replied 'thank you.' we could see the falcon on our TCASII, and it was climbing, while we were descending. The falcon turned wbound (as per the lindz 4) toward our course. When we were within 500 vertical ft of each other, the TCASII gave us an RA to climb. The captain ignored the RA and continued to descend because the falcon was clearly climbing, and he believed climbing would have put us on a collision course with the falcon. We finally saw the falcon when it was about 1 mi away. It passed right over us. Right after it did, I looked at the TCASII and it read 100 ft and changed to 200 ft. Both aircraft were following landing and departing procedure as published or as instructed by ATC, and we still had a near miss. Having aircraft land and depart on opposite runways with very little separation is dangerous and should be stopped.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LR60 ON VISUAL APCH TO RWY 15 TO ASE RECEIVED TCASII RA AND INITIATES EVASIVE ACTION TO AVOID DEP FROM RWY 33.
Narrative: WE WERE ON A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 15, BEHIND ANOTHER LNDG ACFT. THE TWR CTLR TOLD US TO STAY W OF THE RWY CTRLINE FOR TFC. A FALCON WAS TAKING OFF FROM RWY 33 ON THE LINDZ 4 DEP, AFTER THE FALCON CLRED THE FIRST ACFT, WE WERE WARNED ABOUT THE TFC, I RESPONDED THAT IT WAS NOT IN SIGHT, AND THE CTLR REPLIED 'THANK YOU.' WE COULD SEE THE FALCON ON OUR TCASII, AND IT WAS CLBING, WHILE WE WERE DSNDING. THE FALCON TURNED WBOUND (AS PER THE LINDZ 4) TOWARD OUR COURSE. WHEN WE WERE WITHIN 500 VERT FT OF EACH OTHER, THE TCASII GAVE US AN RA TO CLB. THE CAPT IGNORED THE RA AND CONTINUED TO DSND BECAUSE THE FALCON WAS CLRLY CLBING, AND HE BELIEVED CLBING WOULD HAVE PUT US ON A COLLISION COURSE WITH THE FALCON. WE FINALLY SAW THE FALCON WHEN IT WAS ABOUT 1 MI AWAY. IT PASSED RIGHT OVER US. RIGHT AFTER IT DID, I LOOKED AT THE TCASII AND IT READ 100 FT AND CHANGED TO 200 FT. BOTH ACFT WERE FOLLOWING LNDG AND DEPARTING PROC AS PUBLISHED OR AS INSTRUCTED BY ATC, AND WE STILL HAD A NEAR MISS. HAVING ACFT LAND AND DEPART ON OPPOSITE RWYS WITH VERY LITTLE SEPARATION IS DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE STOPPED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.