37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 660014 |
Time | |
Date | 200506 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Weather Elements | Rain |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 135 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
ASRS Report | 660014 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : lead technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : company policies non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : 2 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : work cards contributing factor : manuals performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Chart Or Publication Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
Upon completion of a gate call for oxygen servicing on aircraft; my lead technician informed me that the crew was on board during the servicing and that the aircraft should have been de-energized. I believed the aircraft was vacant and was unaware that personnel were on aircraft at the time of servicing and did not interpretation the aircraft maintenance manual correctly about de-energizing the aircraft; as it is not clearly stated in the aircraft maintenance manual.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EMB135 HAD OXYGEN SVC PERFORMED IMPROPERLY. ACFT WAS ELECTRICALLY PWRED WITH FLT CREW ON BOARD.
Narrative: UPON COMPLETION OF A GATE CALL FOR OXYGEN SVCING ON ACFT; MY LEAD TECHNICIAN INFORMED ME THAT THE CREW WAS ON BOARD DURING THE SVCING AND THAT THE ACFT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DE-ENERGIZED. I BELIEVED THE ACFT WAS VACANT AND WAS UNAWARE THAT PERSONNEL WERE ON ACFT AT THE TIME OF SVCING AND DID NOT INTERP THE ACFT MAINT MANUAL CORRECTLY ABOUT DE-ENERGIZING THE ACFT; AS IT IS NOT CLRLY STATED IN THE ACFT MAINT MANUAL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.