Narrative:

We landed dca early. We were assigned gate X but it was occupied with an aircraft apparently with a mechanical issue. We advised ATC that our gate was not available and went to a hold pad at the approach end of runway 15. The aircraft at gate X later pushed and then we went to gate X. Instead of being early; we were 9 mins late. We blocked in at XA48. On mar/sun I noticed that somebody had changed our in-time to XA26. This is not only stealing; since I am paid by the hour; but it misrepresents my log times that control my far flight time and rest limitations. It is because someone has been changing our in and out times that I have been watching this. Our flight attendants should be notified of this also since their pay may be affected.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLT CREW OF A320 BELIEVES THE COMPANY ALTERED BLOCK ARR TIME ON A FLT WHICH WAS DELAYED AFTER LNDG DUE TO NO GATE AVAILABLE.

Narrative: WE LANDED DCA EARLY. WE WERE ASSIGNED GATE X BUT IT WAS OCCUPIED WITH AN ACFT APPARENTLY WITH A MECHANICAL ISSUE. WE ADVISED ATC THAT OUR GATE WAS NOT AVAILABLE AND WENT TO A HOLD PAD AT THE APCH END OF RWY 15. THE ACFT AT GATE X LATER PUSHED AND THEN WE WENT TO GATE X. INSTEAD OF BEING EARLY; WE WERE 9 MINS LATE. WE BLOCKED IN AT XA48. ON MAR/SUN I NOTICED THAT SOMEBODY HAD CHANGED OUR IN-TIME TO XA26. THIS IS NOT ONLY STEALING; SINCE I AM PAID BY THE HR; BUT IT MISREPRESENTS MY LOG TIMES THAT CTL MY FAR FLT TIME AND REST LIMITATIONS. IT IS BECAUSE SOMEONE HAS BEEN CHANGING OUR IN AND OUT TIMES THAT I HAVE BEEN WATCHING THIS. OUR FLT ATTENDANTS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED OF THIS ALSO SINCE THEIR PAY MAY BE AFFECTED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.