37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 692713 |
Time | |
Date | 200603 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mci.airport |
State Reference | KS |
Altitude | msl single value : 4000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mci.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Route In Use | departure : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mci.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Experience | controller military : 4 controller radar : 25 |
ASRS Report | 692713 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : departure |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | vertical : 600 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
Crj departure runway 1L assigned heading 010 degrees. B737 departed heading 030 degrees. Both aircraft switched to departure control. Departure; for unknown reasons; turned crj to heading 090 degrees; as he was leaving 4200 ft MSL. Crj turned into B737. Traffic was issued; but B737 didn't see the crj. Separation was lost. Local orders allow departure control to turn aircraft in tower airspace unless verbally restr by the tower. I made no restr to departure control; but held onto both aircraft until both were displayed on departure's scope. When departure turned the crj; he was 1200 ft MSL above tower airspace. Management decided I'm to blame for departure's mistake. The problem as I see it; is a procedure that some controllers believe allows them to turn any aircraft at any time if there was no verbal restr issued. Even though initial departure separation was applied; and departure control turned his aircraft into another departure aircraft; in his own airspace they're holding local control responsible for the error. Training on the procedure (in effect since feb/05) was nothing more than a power point presentation of a training officer reading the newly instituted paragraph.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MCI LCL CTLR EXPERIENCED OPERROR AT 4000 FT WHEN DEP CTLR TURNED FIRST DEP ACFT INTO SUCCEEDING DEP TFC.
Narrative: CRJ DEP RWY 1L ASSIGNED HDG 010 DEGS. B737 DEPARTED HDG 030 DEGS. BOTH ACFT SWITCHED TO DEP CTL. DEP; FOR UNKNOWN REASONS; TURNED CRJ TO HDG 090 DEGS; AS HE WAS LEAVING 4200 FT MSL. CRJ TURNED INTO B737. TFC WAS ISSUED; BUT B737 DIDN'T SEE THE CRJ. SEPARATION WAS LOST. LCL ORDERS ALLOW DEP CTL TO TURN ACFT IN TWR AIRSPACE UNLESS VERBALLY RESTR BY THE TWR. I MADE NO RESTR TO DEP CTL; BUT HELD ONTO BOTH ACFT UNTIL BOTH WERE DISPLAYED ON DEP'S SCOPE. WHEN DEP TURNED THE CRJ; HE WAS 1200 FT MSL ABOVE TWR AIRSPACE. MGMNT DECIDED I'M TO BLAME FOR DEP'S MISTAKE. THE PROB AS I SEE IT; IS A PROC THAT SOME CTLRS BELIEVE ALLOWS THEM TO TURN ANY ACFT AT ANY TIME IF THERE WAS NO VERBAL RESTR ISSUED. EVEN THOUGH INITIAL DEP SEPARATION WAS APPLIED; AND DEP CTL TURNED HIS ACFT INTO ANOTHER DEP ACFT; IN HIS OWN AIRSPACE THEY'RE HOLDING LCL CTL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ERROR. TRAINING ON THE PROC (IN EFFECT SINCE FEB/05) WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A PWR POINT PRESENTATION OF A TRAINING OFFICER READING THE NEWLY INSTITUTED PARAGRAPH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.