Narrative:

On departure off of runway 24 at teb; the crew was accomplishing the noise abatement procedure; which caused us to do a slow or a little late turn to the SID heading of 280 degrees (teb 5 departure). The crew was following all procedures; but the controller was more in a hurry for us to get to the heading. For this reason is why I am filing. Safety of flight is the most important item. Doing a noise abatement procedure off of this runway and doing a SID of this nature puts the crews in a very heavy workload; especially with a controller (ATC) of this nature. Solution is to either fix the SID or get rid of noise abatement procedure. I can see many possible violation or NASA forms being filed by many crews; because of this situation with teb 5 and the noise abatement procedures at teb.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: HAWKER 800XP FLT CREW IS ASKED BY ATC TO START A TURN TO 280 DEG HEADING DURING TEB 5 DEP.

Narrative: ON DEP OFF OF RWY 24 AT TEB; THE CREW WAS ACCOMPLISHING THE NOISE ABATEMENT PROC; WHICH CAUSED US TO DO A SLOW OR A LITTLE LATE TURN TO THE SID HEADING OF 280 DEGS (TEB 5 DEP). THE CREW WAS FOLLOWING ALL PROCS; BUT THE CTLR WAS MORE IN A HURRY FOR US TO GET TO THE HEADING. FOR THIS REASON IS WHY I AM FILING. SAFETY OF FLT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ITEM. DOING A NOISE ABATEMENT PROC OFF OF THIS RWY AND DOING A SID OF THIS NATURE PUTS THE CREWS IN A VERY HEAVY WORKLOAD; ESPECIALLY WITH A CTLR (ATC) OF THIS NATURE. SOLUTION IS TO EITHER FIX THE SID OR GET RID OF NOISE ABATEMENT PROC. I CAN SEE MANY POSSIBLE VIOLATION OR NASA FORMS BEING FILED BY MANY CREWS; BECAUSE OF THIS SITUATION WITH TEB 5 AND THE NOISE ABATEMENT PROCS AT TEB.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.