G200 gulfstream rejects the takeoff at las due to high temperature and gross weight.

Attributes
ACN	698365
Time
Date	200605
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : las.airport
State Reference	NV
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : corporate
Make Model Name	Gulfstream 200 [G200] (IAI 1126 Galaxy)
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Navigation In Use	other
Flight Phase	ground : takeoff roll
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 115 flight time total : 5900 flight time type : 908
ASRS Report	698365
Person 2
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : first officer
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : company policies non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa other flight crewb
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Environmental Factor Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance

Narrative:

I was scheduled to fly 7 passenger from las to frg and was supposed to depart early morning. We calculated our performance for that time and there were no issues. Our passenger were 1 1/2 hours late. We called for taxi and given an initial clearance to hold short of taxiway H. At that time we were told that our clearance had dropped out of the system and we had to refile. We became very busy and task saturated before takeoff. During the takeoff roll after vr; the airplane failed to rotate even with yoke in full aft position. I called for an abort and we safely brought aircraft to a stop. Upon returning to the ramp. I realized that I had failed to account for the increase in temperature from the time we calculated performance till actual departure time. During that time; the temperature had increased by 9 degrees C. I believe there were several issues that contributed to the situation. I had used current temperatures instead of forecast at ETD. Second; with the flight plan dropping out of the system; we as a crew became very busy re-filing and getting a new clearance; we failed to re-calculate performance.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: G200 GULFSTREAM REJECTS THE TKOF AT LAS DUE TO HIGH TEMP AND GROSS WT.

Narrative: I WAS SCHEDULED TO FLY 7 PAX FROM LAS TO FRG AND WAS SUPPOSED TO DEPART EARLY MORNING. WE CALCULATED OUR PERFORMANCE FOR THAT TIME AND THERE WERE NO ISSUES. OUR PAX WERE 1 1/2 HRS LATE. WE CALLED FOR TAXI AND GIVEN AN INITIAL CLRNC TO HOLD SHORT OF TXWY H. AT THAT TIME WE WERE TOLD THAT OUR CLRNC HAD DROPPED OUT OF THE SYS AND WE HAD TO REFILE. WE BECAME VERY BUSY AND TASK SATURATED BEFORE TKOF. DURING THE TKOF ROLL AFTER VR; THE AIRPLANE FAILED TO ROTATE EVEN WITH YOKE IN FULL AFT POS. I CALLED FOR AN ABORT AND WE SAFELY BROUGHT ACFT TO A STOP. UPON RETURNING TO THE RAMP. I REALIZED THAT I HAD FAILED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE INCREASE IN TEMP FROM THE TIME WE CALCULATED PERFORMANCE TILL ACTUAL DEP TIME. DURING THAT TIME; THE TEMP HAD INCREASED BY 9 DEGS C. I BELIEVE THERE WERE SEVERAL ISSUES THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE SITUATION. I HAD USED CURRENT TEMPS INSTEAD OF FORECAST AT ETD. SECOND; WITH THE FLT PLAN DROPPING OUT OF THE SYS; WE AS A CREW BECAME VERY BUSY RE-FILING AND GETTING A NEW CLRNC; WE FAILED TO RE-CALCULATE PERFORMANCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.