Narrative:

I work for a cargo carrier. We are currently flying with no ELT. The company removed it from the airplane; it was inoperative to use a 90 day dmi. I brought to the attention of management far 121.353 and they assured me this is completely legal; as our MEL is a part 121 document. I did get them to put a handheld emergency position indicating radio beacon on board so long as it doesn't conflict with overwater flts. I still feel this is an extremely unsafe situation.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FO RPTS COMPANY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH FAR ELT REQUIREMENT.

Narrative: I WORK FOR A CARGO CARRIER. WE ARE CURRENTLY FLYING WITH NO ELT. THE COMPANY REMOVED IT FROM THE AIRPLANE; IT WAS INOP TO USE A 90 DAY DMI. I BROUGHT TO THE ATTN OF MGMNT FAR 121.353 AND THEY ASSURED ME THIS IS COMPLETELY LEGAL; AS OUR MEL IS A PART 121 DOCUMENT. I DID GET THEM TO PUT A HANDHELD EMER POS INDICATING RADIO BEACON ON BOARD SO LONG AS IT DOESN'T CONFLICT WITH OVERWATER FLTS. I STILL FEEL THIS IS AN EXTREMELY UNSAFE SITUATION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.