Narrative:

I was on VFR on top IFR clearance 9500 ft MSL. This was given by chicago approach and ZAU had accepted the clearance. The initial altitude was 9000 ft. A direct course to destination would require 11000 ft. I requested the IFR VFR on top clearance instead of climbing to 11000 ft. ZAU; south bend approach; fort wayne approach each understood the IFR clearance as VFR on top. A controller on dayton approach did not understand the clearance as IFR. I expressed disagreement and proceeded as mentioned. He would not state his initials but read from 7110.65R as his supervisor instructed and that I could call the supervisor. I refer to 7110.65R; 7-3-1; aim ATC 4-4-7; and air traffic procedures 5-5-13.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: BE58 PLT DESCRIBED CONFUSION REGARDING VFR ON TOP STATUS WITH APCH CTLR AT DAY TRACON.

Narrative: I WAS ON VFR ON TOP IFR CLRNC 9500 FT MSL. THIS WAS GIVEN BY CHICAGO APCH AND ZAU HAD ACCEPTED THE CLRNC. THE INITIAL ALT WAS 9000 FT. A DIRECT COURSE TO DEST WOULD REQUIRE 11000 FT. I REQUESTED THE IFR VFR ON TOP CLRNC INSTEAD OF CLBING TO 11000 FT. ZAU; SOUTH BEND APCH; FORT WAYNE APCH EACH UNDERSTOOD THE IFR CLRNC AS VFR ON TOP. A CTLR ON DAYTON APCH DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE CLRNC AS IFR. I EXPRESSED DISAGREEMENT AND PROCEEDED AS MENTIONED. HE WOULD NOT STATE HIS INITIALS BUT READ FROM 7110.65R AS HIS SUPVR INSTRUCTED AND THAT I COULD CALL THE SUPVR. I REFER TO 7110.65R; 7-3-1; AIM ATC 4-4-7; AND AIR TFC PROCS 5-5-13.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.