 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A falcon 50-ex departing phl deviated from clearance route because captain misread the pre departure clearance.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 708140 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200608 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | navaid : phx.vortac |
| State Reference | PA |
| Altitude | msl single value : 5000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : phl.tracon |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Falcon 50 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
| Navigation In Use | other |
| Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
| Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 14800 flight time type : 3500 |
| ASRS Report | 708140 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
On departing phl on an IFR flight plan; we were told by the tower to contact phl departure control. Upon contacting them; they queried as to our heading. We replied that we were on runway heading after departing runway 27L. He said that we should be on a 255 degree heading. Before departure; we had looked at departure procedures and notice that it said to fly a 255 degree heading after takeoff if advised to. We had received our clearance via pre departure clearance. Upon looking at the clearance closer; it did say that we were cleared as filed; which was direct mxe VOR; but later in the pre departure clearance it said we were cleared via the phl 7 departure; which included a 255 degree heading after takeoff. We had received a pre departure clearance earlier at pit and it included the SID at the beginning of the pre departure clearance. I think that if the format for pre departure clearance's was standard; then we would not have missed the SID in the pre departure clearance at phl.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A FALCON 50-EX DEPARTING PHL DEVIATED FROM CLRNC RTE BECAUSE CAPT MISREAD THE PDC.
Narrative: ON DEPARTING PHL ON AN IFR FLT PLAN; WE WERE TOLD BY THE TWR TO CONTACT PHL DEP CTL. UPON CONTACTING THEM; THEY QUERIED AS TO OUR HDG. WE REPLIED THAT WE WERE ON RWY HDG AFTER DEPARTING RWY 27L. HE SAID THAT WE SHOULD BE ON A 255 DEG HDG. BEFORE DEP; WE HAD LOOKED AT DEP PROCS AND NOTICE THAT IT SAID TO FLY A 255 DEG HDG AFTER TKOF IF ADVISED TO. WE HAD RECEIVED OUR CLRNC VIA PDC. UPON LOOKING AT THE CLRNC CLOSER; IT DID SAY THAT WE WERE CLRED AS FILED; WHICH WAS DIRECT MXE VOR; BUT LATER IN THE PDC IT SAID WE WERE CLRED VIA THE PHL 7 DEP; WHICH INCLUDED A 255 DEG HDG AFTER TKOF. WE HAD RECEIVED A PDC EARLIER AT PIT AND IT INCLUDED THE SID AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PDC. I THINK THAT IF THE FORMAT FOR PDC'S WAS STANDARD; THEN WE WOULD NOT HAVE MISSED THE SID IN THE PDC AT PHL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.