Cleared for one departure and flying another results in a track deviation during departure from fll.

Attributes
ACN	712477
Time
Date	200610
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : fll.airport
State Reference	FL
Altitude	msl single value : 5000
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : mia.tracon
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	A320
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	climbout : initial
Route In Use	departure : on vectors departure sid : fll
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 215 flight time total : 11550 flight time type : 3405
ASRS Report	712477
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other controllerb
Resolutory Action	controller : issued new clearance
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Assigned zappa one SID out of fll; loaded and flew the fll nine departure. I've been flying in and out of fll for the last 5 yrs. I've never flown anything but the fll nine out of fll and I automatically just loaded it in the FMS. When the pre departure clearance for the flight stated zappa one we both read it. The first officer then briefed the fll nine departure and I accepted it. I led him down the primrose path since I'm the one who loaded the FMS. Both departures use an initial runway heading. We were surprised when the controller cleared us direct jumar. We questioned it saying we had the fll nine departure. The controller said he was showing the zappa one. He cleared us present heading to join the departure. Although there was never any conflict and no airspace was violated it could have been more of an issue if the two departures had been significantly different. As it is they both use the same initial heading and the same dhp 057 degree radial for climb out. I read what I had expected to see instead of what was actually there. I was complacent and stuck in a routine. I am now wide awake!

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CLRED FOR ONE DEP AND FLYING ANOTHER RESULTS IN A TRACK DEV DURING DEP FROM FLL.

Narrative: ASSIGNED ZAPPA ONE SID OUT OF FLL; LOADED AND FLEW THE FLL NINE DEP. I'VE BEEN FLYING IN AND OUT OF FLL FOR THE LAST 5 YRS. I'VE NEVER FLOWN ANYTHING BUT THE FLL NINE OUT OF FLL AND I AUTOMATICALLY JUST LOADED IT IN THE FMS. WHEN THE PDC FOR THE FLT STATED ZAPPA ONE WE BOTH READ IT. THE FO THEN BRIEFED THE FLL NINE DEP AND I ACCEPTED IT. I LED HIM DOWN THE PRIMROSE PATH SINCE I'M THE ONE WHO LOADED THE FMS. BOTH DEPS USE AN INITIAL RWY HDG. WE WERE SURPRISED WHEN THE CTLR CLRED US DIRECT JUMAR. WE QUESTIONED IT SAYING WE HAD THE FLL NINE DEP. THE CTLR SAID HE WAS SHOWING THE ZAPPA ONE. HE CLRED US PRESENT HDG TO JOIN THE DEP. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NEVER ANY CONFLICT AND NO AIRSPACE WAS VIOLATED IT COULD HAVE BEEN MORE OF AN ISSUE IF THE TWO DEPS HAD BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT. AS IT IS THEY BOTH USE THE SAME INITIAL HDG AND THE SAME DHP 057 DEG RADIAL FOR CLBOUT. I READ WHAT I HAD EXPECTED TO SEE INSTEAD OF WHAT WAS ACTUALLY THERE. I WAS COMPLACENT AND STUCK IN A ROUTINE. I AM NOW WIDE AWAKE!

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.