Narrative:

The pms was loaded prior to takeoff. Flying at FL330 the pms indicated the aircraft was light enough to climb to FL350. ATC reported 'no complaints' at FL350. So in order to 'save gas' we elected to climb. After deviating around a 'build up;' at FL350 in 'altitude hold;' ATC cleared us to a point (ewc). After engaging the FMS to that point; the aircraft rolled into a 27 degree bank at FL350. The aircraft acted unusually during the roll. The flight attendants asked what had just happened as the captain was already talking to them on the interphone. There was no altitude or airspeed loss. ATC did not call us for any deviation. Why can't the FMS be restr to 15 degrees of bank above a certain altitude?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MD80 CREW IS CONCERNED ABOUT HIGH AUTOPLT BANK ANGLES AT ALT.

Narrative: THE PMS WAS LOADED PRIOR TO TKOF. FLYING AT FL330 THE PMS INDICATED THE ACFT WAS LIGHT ENOUGH TO CLB TO FL350. ATC RPTED 'NO COMPLAINTS' AT FL350. SO IN ORDER TO 'SAVE GAS' WE ELECTED TO CLB. AFTER DEVIATING AROUND A 'BUILD UP;' AT FL350 IN 'ALT HOLD;' ATC CLRED US TO A POINT (EWC). AFTER ENGAGING THE FMS TO THAT POINT; THE ACFT ROLLED INTO A 27 DEG BANK AT FL350. THE ACFT ACTED UNUSUALLY DURING THE ROLL. THE FLT ATTENDANTS ASKED WHAT HAD JUST HAPPENED AS THE CAPT WAS ALREADY TALKING TO THEM ON THE INTERPHONE. THERE WAS NO ALT OR AIRSPD LOSS. ATC DID NOT CALL US FOR ANY DEV. WHY CAN'T THE FMS BE RESTR TO 15 DEGS OF BANK ABOVE A CERTAIN ALT?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.