37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 716509 |
Time | |
Date | 200611 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : srq.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : srq.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 700 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : srq.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 163 flight time total : 17058 flight time type : 9578 |
ASRS Report | 716509 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : rejected takeoff |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
With jet traffic on 2.5 mi final; tower cleared us for takeoff; no delay. We complied; and then several seconds into takeoff; tower ordered air carrier Y to go around; followed immediately with an order for us to abort. Rejected takeoff was carried out; turned off runway as instructed. Made PA to passenger; called maintenance control to confirm that an abort above 80 KTS required aml entry; then taxied back to gate; deplaned passenger. Called in aml entry to maintenance control; and while waiting for contract mechanic to arrive; required brake cooling period elapsed. Mechanic performed rejected takeoff inspection and signed off aml. Re-boarded remaining passenger and continued flight. Apparently; the tower controller started feeling uncomfortable with the traffic situation he had set up; sending air carrier Y around. It seemed odd to us; however; that he would abort our takeoff as well.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ CAPT DESCRIBED INCIDENT AT SRQ WHEN CTLR ISSUED AN IMMEDIATE TKOF WITH TFC ON FINAL BUT THEN ISSUED GAR AND ABORT INSTRUCTIONS.
Narrative: WITH JET TFC ON 2.5 MI FINAL; TWR CLRED US FOR TKOF; NO DELAY. WE COMPLIED; AND THEN SEVERAL SECONDS INTO TKOF; TWR ORDERED ACR Y TO GO AROUND; FOLLOWED IMMEDIATELY WITH AN ORDER FOR US TO ABORT. REJECTED TKOF WAS CARRIED OUT; TURNED OFF RWY AS INSTRUCTED. MADE PA TO PAX; CALLED MAINT CTL TO CONFIRM THAT AN ABORT ABOVE 80 KTS REQUIRED AML ENTRY; THEN TAXIED BACK TO GATE; DEPLANED PAX. CALLED IN AML ENTRY TO MAINT CTL; AND WHILE WAITING FOR CONTRACT MECH TO ARRIVE; REQUIRED BRAKE COOLING PERIOD ELAPSED. MECH PERFORMED REJECTED TKOF INSPECTION AND SIGNED OFF AML. RE-BOARDED REMAINING PAX AND CONTINUED FLT. APPARENTLY; THE TWR CTLR STARTED FEELING UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE TFC SITUATION HE HAD SET UP; SENDING ACR Y AROUND. IT SEEMED ODD TO US; HOWEVER; THAT HE WOULD ABORT OUR TKOF AS WELL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.