37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 721754 |
Time | |
Date | 200612 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Dawn |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sna.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : pushback |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time type : 9000 |
ASRS Report | 721754 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Company Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Company |
Narrative:
Our flight was released with inoperative center tank flight deck quantity indicator minimum fuel 22.9 and the fueling form indicated 3000 pounds was loaded in center tank via a known quantity loaded. Total fuel at push was 30.0 or so we thought; and takeoff weight was 131.3. Captain; PNF; computed a fuel log and estimated center tanks would run dry at top of climb. Center tank continued to feed for 300 mi at cruise and we knew extra fuel had to have been in center tank. As center tank did run dry and we computed fuel on board at 18.8 (3300 pounds over flight plan). An additional problem was landing weight as remaining projected fuel burn would give us a landing weight of 122.6 (1600 over maximum landing weight). We changed course to direct sac (90 mi west) direct fim fpr. We stepped our altitudes down to increase fuel burn with a target of 13.0 over fim. We made that target within 200 pounds; and from that point on for remainder of descent; approach and landing; normal operations were applied. We landed with 11.6 (120.4 gross) and shut down with 11.34 fuel on board. Maintenance found insignificant amounts of fuel in center tank and completed a new fueling form to verify that center tank was empty for next flight. It is clear now that approximately 3000 pounds extra fuel was in the center rank.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-400 DEPARTS WITH 3000 LBS MORE FUEL IN CTR FUEL TANK THAN CALCULATED.
Narrative: OUR FLT WAS RELEASED WITH INOP CTR TANK FLT DECK QUANTITY INDICATOR MINIMUM FUEL 22.9 AND THE FUELING FORM INDICATED 3000 LBS WAS LOADED IN CTR TANK VIA A KNOWN QUANTITY LOADED. TOTAL FUEL AT PUSH WAS 30.0 OR SO WE THOUGHT; AND TKOF WT WAS 131.3. CAPT; PNF; COMPUTED A FUEL LOG AND ESTIMATED CTR TANKS WOULD RUN DRY AT TOP OF CLB. CTR TANK CONTINUED TO FEED FOR 300 MI AT CRUISE AND WE KNEW EXTRA FUEL HAD TO HAVE BEEN IN CTR TANK. AS CTR TANK DID RUN DRY AND WE COMPUTED FUEL ON BOARD AT 18.8 (3300 LBS OVER FLT PLAN). AN ADDITIONAL PROB WAS LNDG WT AS REMAINING PROJECTED FUEL BURN WOULD GIVE US A LNDG WT OF 122.6 (1600 OVER MAX LNDG WT). WE CHANGED COURSE TO DIRECT SAC (90 MI W) DIRECT FIM FPR. WE STEPPED OUR ALTS DOWN TO INCREASE FUEL BURN WITH A TARGET OF 13.0 OVER FIM. WE MADE THAT TARGET WITHIN 200 LBS; AND FROM THAT POINT ON FOR REMAINDER OF DSCNT; APCH AND LNDG; NORMAL OPS WERE APPLIED. WE LANDED WITH 11.6 (120.4 GROSS) AND SHUT DOWN WITH 11.34 FUEL ON BOARD. MAINT FOUND INSIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF FUEL IN CTR TANK AND COMPLETED A NEW FUELING FORM TO VERIFY THAT CTR TANK WAS EMPTY FOR NEXT FLT. IT IS CLR NOW THAT APPROX 3000 LBS EXTRA FUEL WAS IN THE CTR RANK.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.