37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 723630 |
Time | |
Date | 200701 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : psp.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 7500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : psp.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Learjet 60 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : vacating altitude |
Route In Use | departure : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : psp.tracon |
Make Model Name | Beechcraft Twin Turboprop Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 3500 flight time type : 425 |
ASRS Report | 723630 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment : tcas other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : took evasive action |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Narrative:
We departed psp airport at XA23Z on an IFR flight plan. It was an far part 135 on-demand charter flight with 2 crew and 2 passenger. The WX was VFR with unlimited visibility and clear skies. We were told to depart runway heading and maintain 10000 ft. Shortly after departure; we were given a turn of more than 90 degrees from the runway heading and told to maintain 10000 ft. Psp tower controller handed us off to the palm springs departure controller (frequency unknown). We checked in and he asked us to maintain the previously assigned heading and gave us a climb to 14000 ft. We acknowledged the instructions and were then given a TA from ATC. The traffic was located at 11-12 O'clock position; less than 5 mi away and was above our altitude. We reported that the traffic was not in sight; but we would be looking visually for the king air. ATC advised the king air of our position; altitude and climb clearance to 14000 ft. The king air advised ATC that he would look for us. Within seconds of that transmission; the king air called ATC and advised them that he had our aircraft in sight visually. I think ATC instructed the king air to maintain visual separation from our aircraft; but I am not sure of this. The known fact is that we had not acquired the king air visually at this point. Our climb rate was approximately 4500 FPM due to the mountainous terrain surrounding psp airport. Shortly after the king air called us in sight; we received a TCAS TA. We continued the climb and turn as previously instructed. Within a couple seconds; we received a TCAS RA that stated 'adjust vertical speed. Descend! Descend!' at this point; we were in a r-hand turn to the ATC assigned heading and in a steep climb. Our altitude was 7500 ft MSL and the king air TCAS target was showing 7800 ft MSL. I immediately increased our bank angle to the right (away from the king air) and reduced power. The power reduction and increased bank angle significantly reduced our climb rate; but we still passed through the king air's altitude before the climb stopped (due to inertia). At the same time that we received the TCAS RA; the PIC in the left seat visually acquired the king air at our 9-10 O'clock position and slightly above us. He immediately advised me that he had the king air in sight and that we would miss the target and avoid the conflict. He estimated that we passed within 500-1000 ft laterally and within 200 ft vertically. No dialogue occurred between our aircraft; the king air; or ATC from this point forward regarding what had happened. I doubt the king air saw us pass underneath him. Within mins of this; palm springs departure control passed us to ZLA without any mention of the king air or the conflict. I think there was a breakdown of communication between ATC and the 2 aircraft. The king air may have thought he saw us and really did not; or maybe he saw us and then went heads down in the flight deck. Either way; this event could have easily been avoided with better ATC separation or more diligence on the part of all pilots involved.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LR60 CREW HAS A CLOSE ENCOUNTER WITH A KING AIR ON CLBOUT FROM PSP.
Narrative: WE DEPARTED PSP ARPT AT XA23Z ON AN IFR FLT PLAN. IT WAS AN FAR PART 135 ON-DEMAND CHARTER FLT WITH 2 CREW AND 2 PAX. THE WX WAS VFR WITH UNLIMITED VISIBILITY AND CLR SKIES. WE WERE TOLD TO DEPART RWY HDG AND MAINTAIN 10000 FT. SHORTLY AFTER DEP; WE WERE GIVEN A TURN OF MORE THAN 90 DEGS FROM THE RWY HDG AND TOLD TO MAINTAIN 10000 FT. PSP TWR CTLR HANDED US OFF TO THE PALM SPRINGS DEP CTLR (FREQ UNKNOWN). WE CHKED IN AND HE ASKED US TO MAINTAIN THE PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED HDG AND GAVE US A CLB TO 14000 FT. WE ACKNOWLEDGED THE INSTRUCTIONS AND WERE THEN GIVEN A TA FROM ATC. THE TFC WAS LOCATED AT 11-12 O'CLOCK POS; LESS THAN 5 MI AWAY AND WAS ABOVE OUR ALT. WE RPTED THAT THE TFC WAS NOT IN SIGHT; BUT WE WOULD BE LOOKING VISUALLY FOR THE KING AIR. ATC ADVISED THE KING AIR OF OUR POS; ALT AND CLB CLRNC TO 14000 FT. THE KING AIR ADVISED ATC THAT HE WOULD LOOK FOR US. WITHIN SECONDS OF THAT XMISSION; THE KING AIR CALLED ATC AND ADVISED THEM THAT HE HAD OUR ACFT IN SIGHT VISUALLY. I THINK ATC INSTRUCTED THE KING AIR TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION FROM OUR ACFT; BUT I AM NOT SURE OF THIS. THE KNOWN FACT IS THAT WE HAD NOT ACQUIRED THE KING AIR VISUALLY AT THIS POINT. OUR CLB RATE WAS APPROX 4500 FPM DUE TO THE MOUNTAINOUS TERRAIN SURROUNDING PSP ARPT. SHORTLY AFTER THE KING AIR CALLED US IN SIGHT; WE RECEIVED A TCAS TA. WE CONTINUED THE CLB AND TURN AS PREVIOUSLY INSTRUCTED. WITHIN A COUPLE SECONDS; WE RECEIVED A TCAS RA THAT STATED 'ADJUST VERT SPD. DSND! DSND!' AT THIS POINT; WE WERE IN A R-HAND TURN TO THE ATC ASSIGNED HDG AND IN A STEEP CLB. OUR ALT WAS 7500 FT MSL AND THE KING AIR TCAS TARGET WAS SHOWING 7800 FT MSL. I IMMEDIATELY INCREASED OUR BANK ANGLE TO THE R (AWAY FROM THE KING AIR) AND REDUCED PWR. THE PWR REDUCTION AND INCREASED BANK ANGLE SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED OUR CLB RATE; BUT WE STILL PASSED THROUGH THE KING AIR'S ALT BEFORE THE CLB STOPPED (DUE TO INERTIA). AT THE SAME TIME THAT WE RECEIVED THE TCAS RA; THE PIC IN THE L SEAT VISUALLY ACQUIRED THE KING AIR AT OUR 9-10 O'CLOCK POS AND SLIGHTLY ABOVE US. HE IMMEDIATELY ADVISED ME THAT HE HAD THE KING AIR IN SIGHT AND THAT WE WOULD MISS THE TARGET AND AVOID THE CONFLICT. HE ESTIMATED THAT WE PASSED WITHIN 500-1000 FT LATERALLY AND WITHIN 200 FT VERTICALLY. NO DIALOGUE OCCURRED BTWN OUR ACFT; THE KING AIR; OR ATC FROM THIS POINT FORWARD REGARDING WHAT HAD HAPPENED. I DOUBT THE KING AIR SAW US PASS UNDERNEATH HIM. WITHIN MINS OF THIS; PALM SPRINGS DEP CTL PASSED US TO ZLA WITHOUT ANY MENTION OF THE KING AIR OR THE CONFLICT. I THINK THERE WAS A BREAKDOWN OF COM BTWN ATC AND THE 2 ACFT. THE KING AIR MAY HAVE THOUGHT HE SAW US AND REALLY DID NOT; OR MAYBE HE SAW US AND THEN WENT HEADS DOWN IN THE FLT DECK. EITHER WAY; THIS EVENT COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN AVOIDED WITH BETTER ATC SEPARATION OR MORE DILIGENCE ON THE PART OF ALL PLTS INVOLVED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.