37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 724399 |
Time | |
Date | 200701 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 32000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zzz.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 201 flight time type : 14000 |
ASRS Report | 724399 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : apu oil pressure indication other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : diverted to another airport flight crew : landed in emergency condition flight crew : declared emergency |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Company Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Aircraft had a MEL for #1 engine generator inoperative. Over ZZZ; we noticed the APU low oil pressure light started to flicker. It would not remain on but just blink on intermittently. We consulted the QRH which said an APU low oil pressure condition would cause the APU to automatic shutdown. The APU was running with no other lights (maintenance) on and no temperature fluctuations. We believed it might be a false indication as the light would just flicker and no automatic shutdown was occurring. I made voice contact with dispatch and explained what was going on and to relay to maintenance. The first officer checked all WX down-range in case the APU did shut down and it was clear the rest of the way. We received several ACARS messages shortly thereafter concerning notes in the QRH and if the APU was shut down. I made voice contact again and asked dispatch to get a chief pilot on line to get another opinion. There were numerous problems getting that to happen and we eventually lost voice contact without talking to a chief pilot. I continued voice contact attempts. We received an ACARS message recommending we divert to nearest suitable airport. We picked ZZZ1; told ATC and sent dispatch our intentions. Dispatch sent back a message that ZZZ2 was nearest suitable airport; so we headed there. During this time; it was our impression that if a divert was recommended; then the chief pilot must have been of the opinion that the APU should be shut down (although some of our conversations with dispatch led us to believe that they thought the APU had already shut down). We shut down the APU and accomplished the APU low oil pressure and source off checklists in the QRH. We landed in ZZZ2; 500 pounds over structural limit; about 10 mins after the divert message was received. The inability to talk to a chief pilot and maintain voice communication with dispatch definitely affected our decision making process.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-700 APU OIL PRESSURE INDICATED LOW IN FLT DURING SINGLE GEN OPERATION. THE CREW SECURED THE APU; DECLARED AN EMERGENCY; AND DIVERTED A NEARBY ARPT.
Narrative: ACFT HAD A MEL FOR #1 ENG GENERATOR INOP. OVER ZZZ; WE NOTICED THE APU LOW OIL PRESSURE LIGHT STARTED TO FLICKER. IT WOULD NOT REMAIN ON BUT JUST BLINK ON INTERMITTENTLY. WE CONSULTED THE QRH WHICH SAID AN APU LOW OIL PRESSURE CONDITION WOULD CAUSE THE APU TO AUTO SHUTDOWN. THE APU WAS RUNNING WITH NO OTHER LIGHTS (MAINT) ON AND NO TEMP FLUCTUATIONS. WE BELIEVED IT MIGHT BE A FALSE INDICATION AS THE LIGHT WOULD JUST FLICKER AND NO AUTO SHUTDOWN WAS OCCURRING. I MADE VOICE CONTACT WITH DISPATCH AND EXPLAINED WHAT WAS GOING ON AND TO RELAY TO MAINT. THE FO CHKED ALL WX DOWN-RANGE IN CASE THE APU DID SHUT DOWN AND IT WAS CLR THE REST OF THE WAY. WE RECEIVED SEVERAL ACARS MESSAGES SHORTLY THEREAFTER CONCERNING NOTES IN THE QRH AND IF THE APU WAS SHUT DOWN. I MADE VOICE CONTACT AGAIN AND ASKED DISPATCH TO GET A CHIEF PLT ON LINE TO GET ANOTHER OPINION. THERE WERE NUMEROUS PROBS GETTING THAT TO HAPPEN AND WE EVENTUALLY LOST VOICE CONTACT WITHOUT TALKING TO A CHIEF PLT. I CONTINUED VOICE CONTACT ATTEMPTS. WE RECEIVED AN ACARS MESSAGE RECOMMENDING WE DIVERT TO NEAREST SUITABLE ARPT. WE PICKED ZZZ1; TOLD ATC AND SENT DISPATCH OUR INTENTIONS. DISPATCH SENT BACK A MESSAGE THAT ZZZ2 WAS NEAREST SUITABLE ARPT; SO WE HEADED THERE. DURING THIS TIME; IT WAS OUR IMPRESSION THAT IF A DIVERT WAS RECOMMENDED; THEN THE CHIEF PLT MUST HAVE BEEN OF THE OPINION THAT THE APU SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN (ALTHOUGH SOME OF OUR CONVERSATIONS WITH DISPATCH LED US TO BELIEVE THAT THEY THOUGHT THE APU HAD ALREADY SHUT DOWN). WE SHUT DOWN THE APU AND ACCOMPLISHED THE APU LOW OIL PRESSURE AND SOURCE OFF CHKLISTS IN THE QRH. WE LANDED IN ZZZ2; 500 LBS OVER STRUCTURAL LIMIT; ABOUT 10 MINS AFTER THE DIVERT MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED. THE INABILITY TO TALK TO A CHIEF PLT AND MAINTAIN VOICE COM WITH DISPATCH DEFINITELY AFFECTED OUR DECISION MAKING PROCESS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.