37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 730104 |
Time | |
Date | 200703 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : pcm.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Fog Rain |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : tpa.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skylane 182/RG Turbo Skylane/RG |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument non precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : tpa.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other vortac |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument non precision approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | IFR Combined VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 20 flight time total : 4200 flight time type : 4100 |
ASRS Report | 730104 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather Airport FAA |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
The runways at pcm are runway 28/10. A C172 was making a VOR approach to runway 28. ATC advised the C172 to 'cancel as soon as possible' because my aircraft (182RG) and a piper seneca were inbound on a runway 10 GPS approach. The C172 pilot had a thick foreign accent and was difficult to understand. I monitored the unicom frequency and tpa approach. The C172 pilot canceled his IFR. As I passed the OM I was cleared for the approach and went to unicom and asked the C172 his location. He replied he was downwind for runway 28. I then received a tis traffic conflict on my mfd. Next; the C172 pilot said he was 'crossing over' to go downwind for runway 10. I was now descending through 800 ft AGL in rain and clouds. I had no visibility down or forward. When I came out of the clouds I instructed the C172 to remain downwind until I was able to locate him visually. I was extremely distraction while avoiding a collision and failed to cancel my IFR flight plan until approximately 45 mins later. I then called flight service and they verified my cancellation with tpa approach. The C172 pilot created a hazard by not landing on runway 28 as expected. He was below 500 ft when I finally saw him pass my left wing. He was definitely trying to go VFR under solid IFR conditions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN IMC IFR C182 PLT ON A PCM RWY 10 GPS ENCOUNTERED A C172 AFTER A VOR 28 APCH IN WHICH HE TURNED A RWY 10 DOWNWIND. THE RPTR FAILED TO CNX IFR.
Narrative: THE RWYS AT PCM ARE RWY 28/10. A C172 WAS MAKING A VOR APCH TO RWY 28. ATC ADVISED THE C172 TO 'CANCEL ASAP' BECAUSE MY ACFT (182RG) AND A PIPER SENECA WERE INBOUND ON A RWY 10 GPS APCH. THE C172 PLT HAD A THICK FOREIGN ACCENT AND WAS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. I MONITORED THE UNICOM FREQ AND TPA APCH. THE C172 PLT CANCELED HIS IFR. AS I PASSED THE OM I WAS CLRED FOR THE APCH AND WENT TO UNICOM AND ASKED THE C172 HIS LOCATION. HE REPLIED HE WAS DOWNWIND FOR RWY 28. I THEN RECEIVED A TIS TFC CONFLICT ON MY MFD. NEXT; THE C172 PLT SAID HE WAS 'XING OVER' TO GO DOWNWIND FOR RWY 10. I WAS NOW DSNDING THROUGH 800 FT AGL IN RAIN AND CLOUDS. I HAD NO VISIBILITY DOWN OR FORWARD. WHEN I CAME OUT OF THE CLOUDS I INSTRUCTED THE C172 TO REMAIN DOWNWIND UNTIL I WAS ABLE TO LOCATE HIM VISUALLY. I WAS EXTREMELY DISTR WHILE AVOIDING A COLLISION AND FAILED TO CANCEL MY IFR FLT PLAN UNTIL APPROX 45 MINS LATER. I THEN CALLED FLT SVC AND THEY VERIFIED MY CANCELLATION WITH TPA APCH. THE C172 PLT CREATED A HAZARD BY NOT LNDG ON RWY 28 AS EXPECTED. HE WAS BELOW 500 FT WHEN I FINALLY SAW HIM PASS MY L WING. HE WAS DEFINITELY TRYING TO GO VFR UNDER SOLID IFR CONDITIONS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.