37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 733809 |
Time | |
Date | 200703 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mer.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 1200 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mer.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach ground : maintenance |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mer.tower |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 390 flight time type : 45 |
ASRS Report | 733809 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 300 vertical : 20 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport Airspace Structure Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Narrative:
My student and I departed after some landing practice to return to our home base (mer). Upon checking in with tower; we were told to enter a left downwind for runway 31. Normally a right downwind is used for runway 31 at castle; but sometimes we use the left downwind when it is convenient. Once we started to get abeam the departure end; a seneca (or seminole; but I believe seneca) checked in '3.5 mi to the west.' I looked down at my compass and saw west was behind us; slightly to the right of our tail. I thought 'he will be sequenced behind us.' key phrase here is 'I thought.' we then proceeded on the left downwind; and continued to monitor the radio calls. At one point; tower called us and told us we were #2 (as my student later reiterated) traffic was 1 O'clock position; a cessna. Now interestingly enough; the tower meant to say we were following the seneca; and in reality we were now #3; because there actually was a cessna turning a right base. In hindsight; I realize I transposed the tower given direction of 1 O'clock position with the cessna which was in our 11 O'clock position. But we were told we were #2 behind a cessna; and when I looked out and saw a cessna; that's all I needed. At the 45 degree point; my student turned base. At that point; massive confusion reigned. The tower told us to make a right 360 degree turn. I took control from my student; confirmed the right 360 degree turn with tower; at which point he said no. We re-entered the left base; at which point I heard another controller come on frequency. He admonished us to 'follow directions;' and told us the seneca's real position. I immediately realized we were to follow the seneca; which was now off to our right. I rolled right; saw the seneca; which was above us; to our right; descending; and rolling into us. There was a few seconds where I was not sure that I had many options as all of them seemed to put us on a collision course. I finally rolled hard right (stall warning blaring) and we made it; albeit very close; maybe 200-300 ft separation. I don't know if the seneca saw us. We then followed behind him. I called the tower afterwards (they did not ask me; I called on my own) and was told it was a trainee controller; so we were told we were #2 when we were #3 and told to follow a cessna when it was a seneca. All in all; I have no hard feelings toward the controllers about this situation; but felt I needed to write in about this for one specific reason -- this place needs radar! This tower was just put into operation a couple of months ago and these controllers so far have been doing a great job. But they have a tough one; with 7-8 aircraft in the pattern at any one time. Anything from a tail dragger to a C130 and DC8. And I hear that it's possible that mer may lose funding for the tower (we were told this by the airport management and others). No! This tower needs to be here and it needs radar! Keep in mind that mce is just a few mi away (heavy student traffic along with B1900 and cpr jet traffic) and so is turlock (O15); although turlock is fairly quiet. It is mind boggling to think that this piece of airspace is being managed with binoculars.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT PILOT APCHING MER WERE GIVEN CONFUSING TFC AND SEQUENCE INFO BY A TRAINEE CONTROLLER CAUSING AN NMAC IN THE TFC PATTERN.
Narrative: MY STUDENT AND I DEPARTED AFTER SOME LNDG PRACTICE TO RETURN TO OUR HOME BASE (MER). UPON CHKING IN WITH TWR; WE WERE TOLD TO ENTER A L DOWNWIND FOR RWY 31. NORMALLY A R DOWNWIND IS USED FOR RWY 31 AT CASTLE; BUT SOMETIMES WE USE THE L DOWNWIND WHEN IT IS CONVENIENT. ONCE WE STARTED TO GET ABEAM THE DEP END; A SENECA (OR SEMINOLE; BUT I BELIEVE SENECA) CHKED IN '3.5 MI TO THE W.' I LOOKED DOWN AT MY COMPASS AND SAW W WAS BEHIND US; SLIGHTLY TO THE R OF OUR TAIL. I THOUGHT 'HE WILL BE SEQUENCED BEHIND US.' KEY PHRASE HERE IS 'I THOUGHT.' WE THEN PROCEEDED ON THE L DOWNWIND; AND CONTINUED TO MONITOR THE RADIO CALLS. AT ONE POINT; TWR CALLED US AND TOLD US WE WERE #2 (AS MY STUDENT LATER REITERATED) TFC WAS 1 O'CLOCK POS; A CESSNA. NOW INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH; THE TWR MEANT TO SAY WE WERE FOLLOWING THE SENECA; AND IN REALITY WE WERE NOW #3; BECAUSE THERE ACTUALLY WAS A CESSNA TURNING A R BASE. IN HINDSIGHT; I REALIZE I TRANSPOSED THE TWR GIVEN DIRECTION OF 1 O'CLOCK POS WITH THE CESSNA WHICH WAS IN OUR 11 O'CLOCK POS. BUT WE WERE TOLD WE WERE #2 BEHIND A CESSNA; AND WHEN I LOOKED OUT AND SAW A CESSNA; THAT'S ALL I NEEDED. AT THE 45 DEG POINT; MY STUDENT TURNED BASE. AT THAT POINT; MASSIVE CONFUSION REIGNED. THE TWR TOLD US TO MAKE A R 360 DEG TURN. I TOOK CTL FROM MY STUDENT; CONFIRMED THE R 360 DEG TURN WITH TWR; AT WHICH POINT HE SAID NO. WE RE-ENTERED THE L BASE; AT WHICH POINT I HEARD ANOTHER CTLR COME ON FREQ. HE ADMONISHED US TO 'FOLLOW DIRECTIONS;' AND TOLD US THE SENECA'S REAL POS. I IMMEDIATELY REALIZED WE WERE TO FOLLOW THE SENECA; WHICH WAS NOW OFF TO OUR R. I ROLLED R; SAW THE SENECA; WHICH WAS ABOVE US; TO OUR R; DSNDING; AND ROLLING INTO US. THERE WAS A FEW SECONDS WHERE I WAS NOT SURE THAT I HAD MANY OPTIONS AS ALL OF THEM SEEMED TO PUT US ON A COLLISION COURSE. I FINALLY ROLLED HARD R (STALL WARNING BLARING) AND WE MADE IT; ALBEIT VERY CLOSE; MAYBE 200-300 FT SEPARATION. I DON'T KNOW IF THE SENECA SAW US. WE THEN FOLLOWED BEHIND HIM. I CALLED THE TWR AFTERWARDS (THEY DID NOT ASK ME; I CALLED ON MY OWN) AND WAS TOLD IT WAS A TRAINEE CTLR; SO WE WERE TOLD WE WERE #2 WHEN WE WERE #3 AND TOLD TO FOLLOW A CESSNA WHEN IT WAS A SENECA. ALL IN ALL; I HAVE NO HARD FEELINGS TOWARD THE CTLRS ABOUT THIS SITUATION; BUT FELT I NEEDED TO WRITE IN ABOUT THIS FOR ONE SPECIFIC REASON -- THIS PLACE NEEDS RADAR! THIS TWR WAS JUST PUT INTO OP A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO AND THESE CTLRS SO FAR HAVE BEEN DOING A GREAT JOB. BUT THEY HAVE A TOUGH ONE; WITH 7-8 ACFT IN THE PATTERN AT ANY ONE TIME. ANYTHING FROM A TAIL DRAGGER TO A C130 AND DC8. AND I HEAR THAT IT'S POSSIBLE THAT MER MAY LOSE FUNDING FOR THE TWR (WE WERE TOLD THIS BY THE ARPT MGMNT AND OTHERS). NO! THIS TWR NEEDS TO BE HERE AND IT NEEDS RADAR! KEEP IN MIND THAT MCE IS JUST A FEW MI AWAY (HVY STUDENT TFC ALONG WITH B1900 AND CPR JET TFC) AND SO IS TURLOCK (O15); ALTHOUGH TURLOCK IS FAIRLY QUIET. IT IS MIND BOGGLING TO THINK THAT THIS PIECE OF AIRSPACE IS BEING MANAGED WITH BINOCULARS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.