Narrative:

I was working ptw sector when the controller working ard sector told me about 2 back course localizer runway 6 approachs into pne. I told the controller about a DH8A; on a converging ILS runway 17 approach. The DH8A was cleared for the approach and established on the localizer. I noticed the second aircraft for the approach into pne was heading wbound toward the final for runway 17 into phl. The ard controller was busy and I yelled for him to turn his aircraft sbound away from my final. I turn the DH8A wbound; but they got within 3 mi of each other. I think when phl is running approachs to runway 17 pne should not have approachs to runway 6. There is too great a chance for conflict.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PHL APCH CTLR EXPERIENCED OPERROR AT 3000 WHEN INTRAFAC COORD FAILED AND CONFLICTING ACFT ON APCH WERE NOT TURNED SOON ENOUGH.

Narrative: I WAS WORKING PTW SECTOR WHEN THE CTLR WORKING ARD SECTOR TOLD ME ABOUT 2 BACK COURSE LOC RWY 6 APCHS INTO PNE. I TOLD THE CTLR ABOUT A DH8A; ON A CONVERGING ILS RWY 17 APCH. THE DH8A WAS CLRED FOR THE APCH AND ESTABLISHED ON THE LOC. I NOTICED THE SECOND ACFT FOR THE APCH INTO PNE WAS HDG WBOUND TOWARD THE FINAL FOR RWY 17 INTO PHL. THE ARD CTLR WAS BUSY AND I YELLED FOR HIM TO TURN HIS ACFT SBOUND AWAY FROM MY FINAL. I TURN THE DH8A WBOUND; BUT THEY GOT WITHIN 3 MI OF EACH OTHER. I THINK WHEN PHL IS RUNNING APCHS TO RWY 17 PNE SHOULD NOT HAVE APCHS TO RWY 6. THERE IS TOO GREAT A CHANCE FOR CONFLICT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.