Narrative:

Discovered split flap condition on approach; approximately 9 degrees right; 13 degrees left. We were light weight -44 passenger; 6000 pounds fuel. Long runway; light winds. I decided to land straight ahead. Normal landing. We cycled flaps once; same condition. Landing data showed good for landing in those conditions. Worked fine when maintenance came on the ground; of course. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the PF never felt any flap asymmetry in the controls and it is suspected that the flap position indicator was sticking; causing the flaps to lock. This condition could not be duplicated when maintenance came onboard at the gate; although it is believed that the flap position indicator was later changed as a precaution.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737 FLT CREW REPORTS FLAP ASYMMETRY DURING APPROACH AS INDICATED BUT NOT FELT BY THE PF. ACFT IS LIGHT AND PARTIAL FLAP LANDING ENSUES.

Narrative: DISCOVERED SPLIT FLAP CONDITION ON APCH; APPROX 9 DEGS R; 13 DEGS L. WE WERE LIGHT WT -44 PAX; 6000 LBS FUEL. LONG RWY; LIGHT WINDS. I DECIDED TO LAND STRAIGHT AHEAD. NORMAL LNDG. WE CYCLED FLAPS ONCE; SAME CONDITION. LNDG DATA SHOWED GOOD FOR LNDG IN THOSE CONDITIONS. WORKED FINE WHEN MAINT CAME ON THE GND; OF COURSE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE PF NEVER FELT ANY FLAP ASYMMETRY IN THE CONTROLS AND IT IS SUSPECTED THAT THE FLAP POSITION INDICATOR WAS STICKING; CAUSING THE FLAPS TO LOCK. THIS CONDITION COULD NOT BE DUPLICATED WHEN MAINTENANCE CAME ONBOARD AT THE GATE; ALTHOUGH IT IS BELIEVED THAT THE FLAP POSITION INDICATOR WAS LATER CHANGED AS A PRECAUTION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.