37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 777934 |
Time | |
Date | 200803 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Weather Elements | Ice |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : zzz.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Helicopter |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 2800 flight time type : 800 |
ASRS Report | 777934 |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather non adherence : company policies non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Weather |
Primary Problem | Weather |
Narrative:
I accepted a VFR flight from the base airport to an accident scene along the lake's shoreline. Forecast and reported conditions were VFR with visibilities P6SM and the lowest ceiling approximately 2000 ft AGL with most higher. 5 mi from the shoreline and 10 NM from the accident scene; I encountered an unforecasted scattered layer with bases at 500 ft and tops near 1000 ft AGL. I easily avoided the clouds. Fortunately; a news helicopter encountered the same scattered layer and remarked on helicopter common traffic 123.025 that it became a broken layer along the lake shore. I queried the pilot and based upon his observation; determined the best destination hospital to avoid WX. On the ground; a company pilot confirmed the route from the accident scene to the hospital as VFR and that metars and forecasts still supported each other. The part 135 flight with the patient was uneventful and the scattered layer was localized to within 5 SM of the lake's shoreline. After refueling I conducted another WX review with observations and forecasts showing VFR for the route home. One station; approximately 30 NM west of my destination; reported and forecasted 3 SM visibility -- still within company nighttime VFR minimums; and it was the only station reporting such near my route. Destination AWOS min WX reported 007 scattered; 21 broken with 10 SM visibility. The news copter PIREP and the 007 scattered concerned me enough to check for a direct IFR flight back to base; thinking the lake shore layer might move inland; but I still had plenty of VFR options. IFR planning showed an airmet for potential light icing. PIREPS showed 3 aircraft reporting trace and/or 'barely light' icing with the lowest icing reported at 4000 ft by a C172 slightly west of my destination; and the 2 latest PIREPS showed no icing near my route and destination. Widespread ceilings reported 3000 ft and higher. Official sunset getting close; I chose a VFR flight with company flight following based upon the widespread VFR; but filed (but not activated) an IFR flight plan as my back-up plan. I was concerned about the lake shore layer thickening to a ceiling and moving inland; and didn't want an emergency climb near class B airspace. Thinking icing probability and icing rate a lower risk if WX became questionable; I would activate my flight plan as my bailout. The sun set by the time I picked up the medical crew and departed the hospital for the return flight. All forecasts to the contrary; a nagging feeling told me I was going to be dodging WX in an unfamiliar area if I remained VFR. I trusted my gut feeling 5 mins into the VFR flight; I activated my IFR flight plan with approach. The climb to 4000 ft was in VMC. Within 5 mins of the 35 min IFR flight the conditions gradually changed to IMC. At about 22 mins into the IFR flight I encountered light icing; which I first thought was condensation around the windshield wiper. At about 25 mins; I realized it was icing; but was beginning my approach and felt this was the best option for getting out of the icing. I broke out at 2100 ft as the AWOS reported with visible ground lights; but could not see the airport lights. Within 3 mi of the airport; I encountered another layer while leveled at MDA. At 3/4 mi I was able to see the runway lights and landed uneventfully. I called a PIREP for icing and unforecasted low ceilings during my IFR closeout. 10 mins later the AWOS reported 006 broken. In hindsight; I could have turned around for VMC and out of the icing. Some 'get homeitis' probably came into play. If conditions had worsened and a missed approach needed; I could have been flying longer in icing conditions. Because I encountered no associated icing problems with the aircraft and I was already beginning the approach; I did not declare an emergency for icing. Plus; I felt I was opening myself up for a violation; why did you conduct a planned IFR flight in known icing conditions? It was my back up plan; but how could I prove that. Usually; any one of icing airmets; temperature; or PIREPS immediately disqualifies an IFR flight for me. Initially I felt a VFR flight was safe with a low risk IFR flight plan in my pocket as backup. However; I could have delayedthe return flight to see if my hunch played out. But that would have put me past my 14 hour duty day without supporting data even though my company would have supported my decision. Perhaps this was a second case of get homeitis.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: HELICOPTER PILOT ENCOUNTERS ICING CONDITIONS DURING NIGHT IFR FLIGHT AND CONTINUES TO DESTINATION.
Narrative: I ACCEPTED A VFR FLT FROM THE BASE ARPT TO AN ACCIDENT SCENE ALONG THE LAKE'S SHORELINE. FORECAST AND RPTED CONDITIONS WERE VFR WITH VISIBILITIES P6SM AND THE LOWEST CEILING APPROX 2000 FT AGL WITH MOST HIGHER. 5 MI FROM THE SHORELINE AND 10 NM FROM THE ACCIDENT SCENE; I ENCOUNTERED AN UNFORECASTED SCATTERED LAYER WITH BASES AT 500 FT AND TOPS NEAR 1000 FT AGL. I EASILY AVOIDED THE CLOUDS. FORTUNATELY; A NEWS HELI ENCOUNTERED THE SAME SCATTERED LAYER AND REMARKED ON HELI COMMON TFC 123.025 THAT IT BECAME A BROKEN LAYER ALONG THE LAKE SHORE. I QUERIED THE PLT AND BASED UPON HIS OBSERVATION; DETERMINED THE BEST DEST HOSPITAL TO AVOID WX. ON THE GND; A COMPANY PLT CONFIRMED THE RTE FROM THE ACCIDENT SCENE TO THE HOSPITAL AS VFR AND THAT METARS AND FORECASTS STILL SUPPORTED EACH OTHER. THE PART 135 FLT WITH THE PATIENT WAS UNEVENTFUL AND THE SCATTERED LAYER WAS LOCALIZED TO WITHIN 5 SM OF THE LAKE'S SHORELINE. AFTER REFUELING I CONDUCTED ANOTHER WX REVIEW WITH OBSERVATIONS AND FORECASTS SHOWING VFR FOR THE RTE HOME. ONE STATION; APPROX 30 NM W OF MY DEST; RPTED AND FORECASTED 3 SM VISIBILITY -- STILL WITHIN COMPANY NIGHTTIME VFR MINIMUMS; AND IT WAS THE ONLY STATION RPTING SUCH NEAR MY RTE. DEST AWOS MIN WX RPTED 007 SCATTERED; 21 BROKEN WITH 10 SM VISIBILITY. THE NEWS COPTER PIREP AND THE 007 SCATTERED CONCERNED ME ENOUGH TO CHK FOR A DIRECT IFR FLT BACK TO BASE; THINKING THE LAKE SHORE LAYER MIGHT MOVE INLAND; BUT I STILL HAD PLENTY OF VFR OPTIONS. IFR PLANNING SHOWED AN AIRMET FOR POTENTIAL LIGHT ICING. PIREPS SHOWED 3 ACFT RPTING TRACE AND/OR 'BARELY LIGHT' ICING WITH THE LOWEST ICING RPTED AT 4000 FT BY A C172 SLIGHTLY W OF MY DEST; AND THE 2 LATEST PIREPS SHOWED NO ICING NEAR MY RTE AND DEST. WIDESPREAD CEILINGS RPTED 3000 FT AND HIGHER. OFFICIAL SUNSET GETTING CLOSE; I CHOSE A VFR FLT WITH COMPANY FLT FOLLOWING BASED UPON THE WIDESPREAD VFR; BUT FILED (BUT NOT ACTIVATED) AN IFR FLT PLAN AS MY BACK-UP PLAN. I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE LAKE SHORE LAYER THICKENING TO A CEILING AND MOVING INLAND; AND DIDN'T WANT AN EMER CLB NEAR CLASS B AIRSPACE. THINKING ICING PROBABILITY AND ICING RATE A LOWER RISK IF WX BECAME QUESTIONABLE; I WOULD ACTIVATE MY FLT PLAN AS MY BAILOUT. THE SUN SET BY THE TIME I PICKED UP THE MEDICAL CREW AND DEPARTED THE HOSPITAL FOR THE RETURN FLT. ALL FORECASTS TO THE CONTRARY; A NAGGING FEELING TOLD ME I WAS GOING TO BE DODGING WX IN AN UNFAMILIAR AREA IF I REMAINED VFR. I TRUSTED MY GUT FEELING 5 MINS INTO THE VFR FLT; I ACTIVATED MY IFR FLT PLAN WITH APCH. THE CLB TO 4000 FT WAS IN VMC. WITHIN 5 MINS OF THE 35 MIN IFR FLT THE CONDITIONS GRADUALLY CHANGED TO IMC. AT ABOUT 22 MINS INTO THE IFR FLT I ENCOUNTERED LIGHT ICING; WHICH I FIRST THOUGHT WAS CONDENSATION AROUND THE WINDSHIELD WIPER. AT ABOUT 25 MINS; I REALIZED IT WAS ICING; BUT WAS BEGINNING MY APCH AND FELT THIS WAS THE BEST OPTION FOR GETTING OUT OF THE ICING. I BROKE OUT AT 2100 FT AS THE AWOS RPTED WITH VISIBLE GND LIGHTS; BUT COULD NOT SEE THE ARPT LIGHTS. WITHIN 3 MI OF THE ARPT; I ENCOUNTERED ANOTHER LAYER WHILE LEVELED AT MDA. AT 3/4 MI I WAS ABLE TO SEE THE RWY LIGHTS AND LANDED UNEVENTFULLY. I CALLED A PIREP FOR ICING AND UNFORECASTED LOW CEILINGS DURING MY IFR CLOSEOUT. 10 MINS LATER THE AWOS RPTED 006 BROKEN. IN HINDSIGHT; I COULD HAVE TURNED AROUND FOR VMC AND OUT OF THE ICING. SOME 'GET HOMEITIS' PROBABLY CAME INTO PLAY. IF CONDITIONS HAD WORSENED AND A MISSED APCH NEEDED; I COULD HAVE BEEN FLYING LONGER IN ICING CONDITIONS. BECAUSE I ENCOUNTERED NO ASSOCIATED ICING PROBS WITH THE ACFT AND I WAS ALREADY BEGINNING THE APCH; I DID NOT DECLARE AN EMER FOR ICING. PLUS; I FELT I WAS OPENING MYSELF UP FOR A VIOLATION; WHY DID YOU CONDUCT A PLANNED IFR FLT IN KNOWN ICING CONDITIONS? IT WAS MY BACK UP PLAN; BUT HOW COULD I PROVE THAT. USUALLY; ANY ONE OF ICING AIRMETS; TEMP; OR PIREPS IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFIES AN IFR FLT FOR ME. INITIALLY I FELT A VFR FLT WAS SAFE WITH A LOW RISK IFR FLT PLAN IN MY POCKET AS BACKUP. HOWEVER; I COULD HAVE DELAYEDTHE RETURN FLT TO SEE IF MY HUNCH PLAYED OUT. BUT THAT WOULD HAVE PUT ME PAST MY 14 HR DUTY DAY WITHOUT SUPPORTING DATA EVEN THOUGH MY COMPANY WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED MY DECISION. PERHAPS THIS WAS A SECOND CASE OF GET HOMEITIS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.