37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 795833 |
Time | |
Date | 200807 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : den.airport |
State Reference | CO |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : zzz.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A319 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 140 flight time total : 8000 flight time type : 5100 |
ASRS Report | 795833 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : published procedure non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Environmental Factor Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We were delayed for takeoff due to ATC flow control. We were released and told to position and hold runway 3 and then cleared for takeoff. The brake was already released and the temperature on the #3 brake went to 305 degrees. We got the ECAM that stated delay takeoff until below 300 degrees. Since we were cleared for takeoff and the brake had already been released; I quickly asked the first officer his opinion and then I made the decision to continue the takeoff. Takeoff power had not yet been applied. My reasoning was that this was the only brake above 300 degrees and the other brake was on the same side was about 40 degrees less and the left side brakes were much cooler. I did not think with the other brakes below 300 degrees the stopping capability of the aircraft would be downgraded. And it would be easier to cool the brake with the gear down in-flight than to wait in denver on a hot day. Takeoff was uneventful and the brake cooled quickly once airborne with the gear down. Looking back on this; I believe I should have pulled off the runway and just waited in denver for the brake to cool.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN A319 FLT CREW GOT ECAM MESSAGE THAT ONE BRAKE WAS HOT AS THEY TAXIED INTO POSITION AT DEN FOR TAKEOFF. CAPT CHOSE TO IGNORE THE MESSAGE AND TAKE OFF WITH NO DELAY FOR BRAKE COOLING.
Narrative: WE WERE DELAYED FOR TKOF DUE TO ATC FLOW CTL. WE WERE RELEASED AND TOLD TO POS AND HOLD RWY 3 AND THEN CLRED FOR TKOF. THE BRAKE WAS ALREADY RELEASED AND THE TEMP ON THE #3 BRAKE WENT TO 305 DEGS. WE GOT THE ECAM THAT STATED DELAY TKOF UNTIL BELOW 300 DEGS. SINCE WE WERE CLRED FOR TKOF AND THE BRAKE HAD ALREADY BEEN RELEASED; I QUICKLY ASKED THE FO HIS OPINION AND THEN I MADE THE DECISION TO CONTINUE THE TKOF. TKOF PWR HAD NOT YET BEEN APPLIED. MY REASONING WAS THAT THIS WAS THE ONLY BRAKE ABOVE 300 DEGS AND THE OTHER BRAKE WAS ON THE SAME SIDE WAS ABOUT 40 DEGS LESS AND THE L SIDE BRAKES WERE MUCH COOLER. I DID NOT THINK WITH THE OTHER BRAKES BELOW 300 DEGS THE STOPPING CAPABILITY OF THE ACFT WOULD BE DOWNGRADED. AND IT WOULD BE EASIER TO COOL THE BRAKE WITH THE GEAR DOWN INFLT THAN TO WAIT IN DENVER ON A HOT DAY. TKOF WAS UNEVENTFUL AND THE BRAKE COOLED QUICKLY ONCE AIRBORNE WITH THE GEAR DOWN. LOOKING BACK ON THIS; I BELIEVE I SHOULD HAVE PULLED OFF THE RWY AND JUST WAITED IN DENVER FOR THE BRAKE TO COOL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.