37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 809763 |
Time | |
Date | 200810 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Beech 1900 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 2300 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 809763 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 175 flight time total : 750 flight time type : 400 |
ASRS Report | 809765 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | performance deficiency : fault isolation |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
My first officer and I departed ZZZ1. We did a static takeoff. I advanced the power levers; the #2 engine on the torque seemed to jump. I looked at all the gauges and everything looked fine; so I decided to proceed. I thought I might have added the power in too quickly on the ground in ZZZ1. In cruise we were talking about the gauge sounding and looking like it might have lagged a little. And we were not sure if I added in the power too quickly or if the levers were added more on the left than on the right. We decided to see if it was running smoothly in the air. We took the right power lever and moved it back and forth. The torque looked like it caught (lagged 200 pounds). We tried it again and it flowed through fine. The gauges and flow of the engine looked fine. It did not lag or anything. I told the first officer we would try it on the ground. We landed in ZZZ2 with zero passenger this whole time. I did a high speed taxi to see what the power was doing. We saw that the torque was starting to slow around 600 pounds. It would then creep to 1600 pounds on the torque and then shoot up to 3400 pounds. While rolling down the runway; this caused the plane to drift to the right and then quickly to the left. This was not noticed in ZZZ1 due to doing a static takeoff. On top of that; the lag was much more drastic in ZZZ2. It was obvious it was not an addition of power too fast. I called maintenance control and we got a hold of a mechanic in ZZZ2. He looked under the panel and could not see anything sticking. Maintenance control then told us to go and run the plane. We all went on the runway; did a static; and watched the gauges. Then we tried it rolling and the plane yawed. Recreating the situation; we noticed on the high speed taxi when we first landed in ZZZ2. The mechanic; maintenance control; and I determined it would be safe to ferry the aircraft. Paperwork completed; we left at XA35. Doing the static takeoff with no incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: WHILE PERFORMING A HIGH SPEED TAXI OF A BEECH 1900; TO TROUBLE SHOOT A PW TURBOPROP PT6A-67D- #2 ENGINE; THE CAPTAIN AND FIRST OFFICER NOTICED THE ENGINE TORQUE WAS ERRATIC.
Narrative: MY FO AND I DEPARTED ZZZ1. WE DID A STATIC TKOF. I ADVANCED THE PWR LEVERS; THE #2 ENG ON THE TORQUE SEEMED TO JUMP. I LOOKED AT ALL THE GAUGES AND EVERYTHING LOOKED FINE; SO I DECIDED TO PROCEED. I THOUGHT I MIGHT HAVE ADDED THE PWR IN TOO QUICKLY ON THE GND IN ZZZ1. IN CRUISE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE GAUGE SOUNDING AND LOOKING LIKE IT MIGHT HAVE LAGGED A LITTLE. AND WE WERE NOT SURE IF I ADDED IN THE PWR TOO QUICKLY OR IF THE LEVERS WERE ADDED MORE ON THE L THAN ON THE R. WE DECIDED TO SEE IF IT WAS RUNNING SMOOTHLY IN THE AIR. WE TOOK THE R PWR LEVER AND MOVED IT BACK AND FORTH. THE TORQUE LOOKED LIKE IT CAUGHT (LAGGED 200 LBS). WE TRIED IT AGAIN AND IT FLOWED THROUGH FINE. THE GAUGES AND FLOW OF THE ENG LOOKED FINE. IT DID NOT LAG OR ANYTHING. I TOLD THE FO WE WOULD TRY IT ON THE GND. WE LANDED IN ZZZ2 WITH ZERO PAX THIS WHOLE TIME. I DID A HIGH SPD TAXI TO SEE WHAT THE PWR WAS DOING. WE SAW THAT THE TORQUE WAS STARTING TO SLOW AROUND 600 LBS. IT WOULD THEN CREEP TO 1600 LBS ON THE TORQUE AND THEN SHOOT UP TO 3400 LBS. WHILE ROLLING DOWN THE RWY; THIS CAUSED THE PLANE TO DRIFT TO THE R AND THEN QUICKLY TO THE L. THIS WAS NOT NOTICED IN ZZZ1 DUE TO DOING A STATIC TKOF. ON TOP OF THAT; THE LAG WAS MUCH MORE DRASTIC IN ZZZ2. IT WAS OBVIOUS IT WAS NOT AN ADDITION OF PWR TOO FAST. I CALLED MAINT CTL AND WE GOT A HOLD OF A MECH IN ZZZ2. HE LOOKED UNDER THE PANEL AND COULD NOT SEE ANYTHING STICKING. MAINT CTL THEN TOLD US TO GO AND RUN THE PLANE. WE ALL WENT ON THE RWY; DID A STATIC; AND WATCHED THE GAUGES. THEN WE TRIED IT ROLLING AND THE PLANE YAWED. RECREATING THE SITUATION; WE NOTICED ON THE HIGH SPD TAXI WHEN WE FIRST LANDED IN ZZZ2. THE MECH; MAINT CTL; AND I DETERMINED IT WOULD BE SAFE TO FERRY THE ACFT. PAPERWORK COMPLETED; WE LEFT AT XA35. DOING THE STATIC TKOF WITH NO INCIDENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.