37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 821080 |
Time | |
Date | 200901 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | DCA.Airport |
State Reference | DC |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Route In Use | Other Instrument Non Precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Loran |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
I have been into dca twice in the past month and each time we were told to fly the lda DME runway 19 approach. This approach brings you in over the river much like the visual approach would have you do; and luckily both days I had to shoot this approach the weather favored visual conditions. My concern with the approach is that the localizer is very erratic. The localizer needle will swing from right to left and vice versa. I have never seen the needle actually stabilized. Both times we hand flew the approach since the autopilot was very confused and made unnecessary turns. We didn't want to risk getting into P56. The last time I was on the approach; I kept a close watch of our ground track in relation to what it shows on the approach plate; and the needle proceeded to swing from right to left and remain unstable. For a place that allows so little error; I think we should be able to depend on an approach that is a little more reliable. A lot of crews I think would be very close to not only busting through P56; but also a very unstable descent and tracking if they would have to perform in complete IMC.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: First officer of undisclosed aircraft type reports localizer fluctuations on the LDA DME Runway 19 to DCA.
Narrative: I have been into DCA twice in the past month and each time we were told to fly the LDA DME Runway 19 approach. This approach brings you in over the river much like the visual approach would have you do; and luckily both days I had to shoot this approach the weather favored visual conditions. My concern with the approach is that the localizer is very erratic. The localizer needle will swing from right to left and vice versa. I have never seen the needle actually stabilized. Both times we hand flew the approach since the autopilot was very confused and made unnecessary turns. We didn't want to risk getting into P56. The last time I was on the approach; I kept a close watch of our ground track in relation to what it shows on the approach plate; and the needle proceeded to swing from right to left and remain unstable. For a place that allows so little error; I think we should be able to depend on an approach that is a little more reliable. A lot of crews I think would be very close to not only busting through P56; but also a very unstable descent and tracking if they would have to perform in complete IMC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.