Narrative:

Upon arrival at nome I was confronted by an FAA maintenance inspector. He had been notified by an FAA inspector in unalakleet that there were a few discrepancies on my aircraft. When I did the preflight I had noticed some discrepancies but since I was going VFR part 91 and the plane was going up for maintenance and none of the discrepancies were affecting airworthiness I made the flight. The outcome was they accused me of a possible violation of at far.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT OF ATX SMT ACCUSED OF POSSIBLE FEDERAL AVIATION REG VIOLATION.

Narrative: UPON ARR AT NOME I WAS CONFRONTED BY AN FAA MAINT INSPECTOR. HE HAD BEEN NOTIFIED BY AN FAA INSPECTOR IN UNALAKLEET THAT THERE WERE A FEW DISCREPANCIES ON MY ACFT. WHEN I DID THE PREFLT I HAD NOTICED SOME DISCREPANCIES BUT SINCE I WAS GOING VFR PART 91 AND THE PLANE WAS GOING UP FOR MAINT AND NONE OF THE DISCREPANCIES WERE AFFECTING AIRWORTHINESS I MADE THE FLT. THE OUTCOME WAS THEY ACCUSED ME OF A POSSIBLE VIOLATION OF AT FAR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.