37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 825613 |
Time | |
Date | 200902 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ORD.Airport |
State Reference | IL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 700 ER/LR (CRJ700) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 740 Flight Crew Type 370 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
We were on the radio with chicago approach. We were assigned 330 knots about 5 minutes prior to the occurrence. We were maintaining the 300 knots. As the pilot not flying; I was completing the 'in range checklist' when we encountered wake turbulence. It was the first time I have experienced wake turbulence. The captain controlled and stabilized the aircraft. We were asked 'say speed' by approach; I looked up from the checklist and replied '250 knots.' they reassigned us 300 knots. We then hit turbulence again. The second time was more violent than the first; and the captain clicked off autopilot and hand flew the aircraft slightly above the glide slope to alleviate encountering any further turbulence. The captain asked me to advise the approach controller of the wake turbulence we were encountering (then we hit our third pocket of wake turbulence); however the radio was too saturated to do so; until we were established on the approach. We then told the controller that we had encountered turbulence three times; eliciting no reply. Then they came back on the radio and assigned us a number to call. The captain told me during the event that he was acting in what he thought was the safest manner possible. I believe this to be the case as well. I had no prior experience with wake turbulence and given the events; I believe his actions clearly took safety as the priority.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CRJ-700 First Officer reports the Captain's desire to fly at 250 kts when previously assigned 300 kts because of three wake turbulence encounters on approach to ORD. This was the First Officer's first career wake turbulence encounter.
Narrative: We were on the radio with Chicago Approach. We were assigned 330 knots about 5 minutes prior to the occurrence. We were maintaining the 300 knots. As the pilot not flying; I was completing the 'in range checklist' when we encountered wake turbulence. It was the first time I have experienced wake turbulence. The Captain controlled and stabilized the aircraft. We were asked 'say speed' by approach; I looked up from the checklist and replied '250 knots.' They reassigned us 300 knots. We then hit turbulence again. The second time was more violent than the first; and the Captain clicked off autopilot and hand flew the aircraft slightly above the glide slope to alleviate encountering any further turbulence. The Captain asked me to advise the Approach Controller of the wake turbulence we were encountering (then we hit our third pocket of wake turbulence); however the radio was too saturated to do so; until we were established on the approach. We then told the Controller that we had encountered turbulence three times; eliciting no reply. Then they came back on the radio and assigned us a number to call. The Captain told me during the event that he was acting in what he thought was the safest manner possible. I believe this to be the case as well. I had no prior experience with wake turbulence and given the events; I believe his actions clearly took safety as the priority.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.