37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 844405 |
Time | |
Date | 200907 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | PHX.Airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 193 Flight Crew Type 13500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
We were flight # to phx and right behind us either due to us being late; they being early; or on time; was flight # (similar callsign) to phx. Several clearances for us were taken by the other callsign and ATC had to repeat them; plus ATC gave wrong clearances during a time of high stress due to a last minute runway change and thunderstorms. Headings and holding instructions were mixed. I have addressed this issue with the company first 3 years ago; and got no response. This was a potential safety issue because the company chose to send two similar callsigns to the same airport during the same time period. There is no need for this. In a normal weather situation and low traffic volume; there would be no problems. Why do we need to put a potential 'human factors' problem into a high volume environment like today? Safety concern assigning too similar call signs.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PHX air carrier arrival described call sign confusion event; claiming company chosen similar call signs create a potential human factors safety problem.
Narrative: We were Flight # to PHX and right behind us either due to us being late; they being early; or on time; was Flight # (similar callsign) to PHX. Several clearances for us were taken by the other callsign and ATC had to repeat them; plus ATC gave wrong clearances during a time of high stress due to a last minute runway change and thunderstorms. Headings and holding instructions were mixed. I have addressed this issue with the Company first 3 years ago; and got no response. This was a potential safety issue because the Company chose to send two similar callsigns to the same airport during the same time period. There is no need for this. In a normal weather situation and low traffic volume; there would be no problems. Why do we need to put a potential 'human factors' problem into a high volume environment like today? Safety concern assigning too similar call signs.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.