37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 851489 |
Time | |
Date | 200909 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap/Slat Indication |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 151 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Other / Unknown |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 120 Flight Crew Type 120 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
On approach the flap position indicator indicated a slight split. The pilot flying did not notice any roll. The QRH was referenced and the approach continued to landing. Maintenance was notified and a logbook write up was made. Dispatch was notified through maintenance. After reviewing the events; a better decision would have been to discontinue the approach in order to fully analyze the situation and fully apply the QRH. When there is a jumpseater in the cockpit; I normally brief that they are part of the crew and to speak up if they see something. The jumpseater did do this; and it was very helpful; but there were times when I found the timing distracting and interrupted my train of thought. On approach; the time was compressed as the approach duties interrupted the QRH duties. If the approach had been discontinued there would have had time to fully discuss the situation and utilized all available resources. A plan could have been better communicated with more time and the checklists completed. This time would have been available if we had discontinued the approach. Upon landing we talked to maintenance and made a logbook entry. Dispatch was notified through maintenance; but I should have contacted them directly.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-700 flap indicator split as flaps were lowered but no flap asymmetry was indicated. The Captain completed the Alternate Flap Extension QRH as the First Officer and jumpseat pilot questioned the action. A normal landing was made with no go-around
Narrative: On approach the flap position indicator indicated a slight split. The pilot flying did not notice any roll. The QRH was referenced and the approach continued to landing. Maintenance was notified and a logbook write up was made. Dispatch was notified through Maintenance. After reviewing the events; a better decision would have been to discontinue the approach in order to fully analyze the situation and fully apply the QRH. When there is a jumpseater in the cockpit; I normally brief that they are part of the crew and to speak up if they see something. The jumpseater did do this; and it was very helpful; but there were times when I found the timing distracting and interrupted my train of thought. On approach; the time was compressed as the approach duties interrupted the QRH duties. If the approach had been discontinued there would have had time to fully discuss the situation and utilized all available resources. A plan could have been better communicated with more time and the checklists completed. This time would have been available if we had discontinued the approach. Upon landing we talked to Maintenance and made a logbook entry. Dispatch was notified through Maintenance; but I should have contacted them directly.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.