37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 852056 |
Time | |
Date | 200909 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-800 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Turbine Engine Thrust Reverser |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Maintenance |
Narrative:
During preflight the engine #1 thrust reverser krueger door seal fairing was found to be broken. This is a composite material part that is routinely cracked at the bolt holes. I was concerned about this one because it was completely/nearly completely through at about the 2/3rd point. This event went on for about 4 hours from discovery to departure. About every half hour or so I went down to the engine to see what fresh information I could bring back to the captain. At some point; the broken forward third of the part was removed and a sealant applied to the ragged edge. I informed the captain. Maintenance control agreed with the captain that cdl's generally don't apply to partial part removals. Maintenance was able to obtain a variance from boeing. The second sign off was acceptable to the captain. This is my third ordeal with questionable maintenance this week. I am concerned that excessive management pressure to MEL everything during the day and fix at night is causing unsafe maintenance practices.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 First Officer expressed concern about his carrier's practice of deferring maintenance discrepancies for repair at night whenever possible.
Narrative: During preflight the engine #1 thrust reverser Krueger door seal fairing was found to be broken. This is a composite material part that is routinely cracked at the bolt holes. I was concerned about this one because it was completely/nearly completely through at about the 2/3rd point. This event went on for about 4 hours from discovery to departure. About every half hour or so I went down to the engine to see what fresh information I could bring back to the Captain. At some point; the broken forward third of the part was removed and a sealant applied to the ragged edge. I informed the Captain. Maintenance Control agreed with the Captain that CDL's generally don't apply to partial part removals. Maintenance was able to obtain a variance from Boeing. The second sign off was acceptable to the Captain. This is my third ordeal with questionable maintenance this week. I am concerned that excessive management pressure to MEL everything during the day and fix at night is causing unsafe maintenance practices.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.