37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 853124 |
Time | |
Date | 200909 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Air Conditioning and Pressurization Pack |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 80 Flight Crew Total 9000 Flight Crew Type 1000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
We were on a descent and approach when at 15000' we had an ECAM message air pack 2 fault. We dispatched with an inoperative pack 1. We did the ECAM procedure and tried to restore pack 2 which was causing the system fault. We could not get pack 2 back on line. We thought that pack 2 would come back on line with the increase of power and more bleed pressure. It did not work and at this time we were below 10;000' and the cabin pressure never exceeded 8;000' so we decided to extend the approach because our cabin rate of descent matched our aircraft descent. We tried to keep our pressure changes to a minimum. We continued the approach and landed with no further problems and taxied in and contacted maintenance and wrote up the event.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An A320 dispatched with Pack 1 inoperative and the during descent at 15;000' Pack 2 faulted. The aircraft cabin was at 8;000' and a slow descent to the airport was made for passenger comfort.
Narrative: We were on a descent and approach when at 15000' we had an ECAM message AIR PACK 2 FAULT. We dispatched with an inoperative Pack 1. We did the ECAM procedure and tried to restore pack 2 which was causing the system fault. We could not get Pack 2 back on line. We thought that Pack 2 would come back on line with the increase of power and more bleed pressure. It did not work and at this time we were below 10;000' and the cabin pressure never exceeded 8;000' so we decided to extend the approach because our cabin rate of descent matched our aircraft descent. We tried to keep our pressure changes to a minimum. We continued the approach and landed with no further problems and taxied in and contacted Maintenance and wrote up the event.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.