37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 855064 |
Time | |
Date | 200910 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 900 (CRJ900) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb Initial Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pneumatic System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Total 7500 Flight Crew Type 1100 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
On initial climbout; we got a (left) engine bleed master caution. I completed the after takeoff checklist and engine bleed checklist. After discussing the matter with dispatch and maintenance it was mutually agreed that we would return to our departure airport. After reviewing our fuel situation I determined that we would be landing over max landing weight by about 600lbs. I recommended holding; but dispatch stated that it would be ok as long as we followed the 'landing over weight procedure' that was given to us by maintenance. The first officer and I discussed the procedure which involves touching down at less than 360 fpm to avoid aircraft damage. We agreed that he would continue to fly the aircraft while I completed the appropriate checklists and then I would assume control and land the aircraft. I completed the appropriate setup and briefing for our approach and landing on rwy 10; except I failed to review the required landing distance for our overweight condition. Dispatch had told me to go ahead and land but never sent me appropriate landing numbers. I did brief the runway length of 10;500' and I had just landed on the same runway on our inbound leg. We had reviewed and used the appropriate V speeds for our overweight condition but not the runway length required for our overweight condition . The landing was uneventful with a touchdown rate of 200 FPM and had about 2500 feet remaining. While sitting at the gate I realized my error and explained it to the first officer. The event occurred due to excessive workload; and having just landed on the same runway only a couple hours before in the same VFR conditions. My approach brief was a little rushed and I was focusing on the landing. Since the runway length was 10;500 feet; landing distance was not a key issue.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CRJ900 returned to the departure airport for an overweight landing when they experienced a (L) ENG BLEED warning.
Narrative: On initial climbout; we got a (L) ENG BLEED master caution. I completed the after takeoff checklist and ENG BLEED checklist. After discussing the matter with dispatch and maintenance it was mutually agreed that we would return to our departure airport. After reviewing our fuel situation I determined that we would be landing over max landing weight by about 600lbs. I recommended holding; but dispatch stated that it would be OK as long as we followed the 'landing over weight procedure' that was given to us by maintenance. The First Officer and I discussed the procedure which involves touching down at less than 360 fpm to avoid aircraft damage. We agreed that he would continue to fly the aircraft while I completed the appropriate checklists and then I would assume control and land the aircraft. I completed the appropriate setup and briefing for our approach and landing on Rwy 10; except I failed to review the required landing distance for our overweight condition. Dispatch had told me to go ahead and land but never sent me appropriate landing numbers. I did brief the runway length of 10;500' and I had just landed on the same runway on our inbound leg. We had reviewed and used the appropriate V speeds for our overweight condition but not the runway length required for our overweight condition . The landing was uneventful with a touchdown rate of 200 FPM and had about 2500 feet remaining. While sitting at the gate I realized my error and explained it to the First Officer. The event occurred due to excessive workload; and having just landed on the same runway only a couple hours before in the same VFR conditions. My approach brief was a little rushed and I was focusing on the landing. Since the runway length was 10;500 feet; landing distance was not a key issue.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.