37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 861746 |
Time | |
Date | 200911 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZAB.ARTCC |
State Reference | NM |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Retractable Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 45 Flight Crew Total 960 Flight Crew Type 160 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Upon departure from my home base on an IFR flight to asw; after reaching altitude of 9000; at which time I was able to contact ZAB; I activated my flight plan. However; I thought I had indicated that my desire was to get over the high terrain first under VFR flight rules; ATC responded with a question of flying VFR on top. This had led to my mistake; as a new IFR pilot; of not connecting the dots of the nuance of VFR on top or flying under VFR rules. The controller very kindly requested to speak to me about what I had done to which I had agreed to in my quest of knowing the right thing about all aspects of flying. The controller had explained; what I had already realized; that is while flying VFR on top and having filed IFR direct to destination; I had no discretion to wander over the mountains in search of the shortest and quickest way to the lower terrain on the other side; but to go over the taos VOR (TAS) and gain altitude in a hold first before embarking on my direct routing to destination. Or I should have activated my IFR once in the lower terrain and on the other side of the mountains; while getting there under VFR flight rules. In retrospect; the controller was clear; it was solely my misunderstanding or misinterpretation of what I was instructed to do.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: General aviation pilot on IFR flight plan described confused VFR on TOP scenario when he/she tried to shorten the flight applying VFR rules; but ATC noted the IFR status and handled the flight accordingly.
Narrative: Upon departure from my home base on an IFR flight to ASW; after reaching altitude of 9000; at which time I was able to contact ZAB; I activated my flight plan. However; I thought I had indicated that my desire was to get over the high terrain first under VFR flight rules; ATC responded with a question of flying VFR on top. This had led to my mistake; as a new IFR pilot; of not connecting the dots of the nuance of VFR on top or flying under VFR rules. The controller very kindly requested to speak to me about what I had done to which I had agreed to in my quest of knowing the right thing about all aspects of flying. The controller had explained; what I had already realized; that is while flying VFR on top and having filed IFR direct to destination; I had no discretion to wander over the mountains in search of the shortest and quickest way to the lower terrain on the other side; but to go over the Taos VOR (TAS) and gain altitude in a hold first before embarking on my direct routing to destination. Or I should have activated my IFR once in the lower terrain and on the other side of the mountains; while getting there under VFR flight rules. In retrospect; the controller was clear; it was solely my misunderstanding or misinterpretation of what I was instructed to do.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.